American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

2007, 4(2): 187-203. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2007.4.187

An optimal adaptive time-stepping scheme for solving reaction-diffusion-chemotaxis systems

 1 Department of Mathematics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI 48864, United States 2 Department of Applied Mathematics, Providence University, Taichung, Taiwan

Received  July 2005 Revised  December 2006 Published  February 2007

Reaction-diffusion-chemotaxis systems have proven to be fairly accurate mathematical models for many pattern formation problems in chemistry and biology. These systems are important for computer simulations of patterns, parameter estimations as well as analysis of the biological systems. To solve reaction-diffusion-chemotaxis systems, efficient and reliable numerical algorithms are essential for pattern generations. In this paper, a general reaction-diffusion-chemotaxis system is considered for specific numerical issues of pattern simulations. We propose a fully explicit discretization combined with a variable optimal time step strategy for solving the reactiondiffusion- chemotaxis system. Theorems about stability and convergence of the algorithm are given to show that the algorithm is highly stable and efficient. Numerical experiment results on a model problem are given for comparison with other numerical methods. Simulations on two real biological experiments will also be shown.
Citation: Chichia Chiu, Jui-Ling Yu. An optimal adaptive time-stepping scheme for solving reaction-diffusion-chemotaxis systems. Mathematical Biosciences & Engineering, 2007, 4 (2) : 187-203. doi: 10.3934/mbe.2007.4.187
 [1] Alexandra Köthe, Anna Marciniak-Czochra, Izumi Takagi. Hysteresis-driven pattern formation in reaction-diffusion-ODE systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2020, 40 (6) : 3595-3627. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020170 [2] Yansu Ji, Jianwei Shen, Xiaochen Mao. Pattern formation of Brusselator in the reaction-diffusion system. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2022  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2022103 [3] Joseph G. Yan, Dong-Ming Hwang. Pattern formation in reaction-diffusion systems with $D_2$-symmetric kinetics. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 1996, 2 (2) : 255-270. doi: 10.3934/dcds.1996.2.255 [4] Ching-Shan Chou, Yong-Tao Zhang, Rui Zhao, Qing Nie. Numerical methods for stiff reaction-diffusion systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2007, 7 (3) : 515-525. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2007.7.515 [5] Laurent Desvillettes, Klemens Fellner. Entropy methods for reaction-diffusion systems. Conference Publications, 2007, 2007 (Special) : 304-312. doi: 10.3934/proc.2007.2007.304 [6] Yuan Lou, Wei-Ming Ni, Shoji Yotsutani. Pattern formation in a cross-diffusion system. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2015, 35 (4) : 1589-1607. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.1589 [7] Maxime Breden, Christian Kuehn, Cinzia Soresina. On the influence of cross-diffusion in pattern formation. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2021, 8 (2) : 213-240. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2021010 [8] Tian Ma, Shouhong Wang. Dynamic transition and pattern formation for chemotactic systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2014, 19 (9) : 2809-2835. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2014.19.2809 [9] Mihaela Negreanu, J. Ignacio Tello. On a comparison method to reaction-diffusion systems and its applications to chemotaxis. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2013, 18 (10) : 2669-2688. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2013.18.2669 [10] Weihua Jiang, Xun Cao, Chuncheng Wang. Turing instability and pattern formations for reaction-diffusion systems on 2D bounded domain. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2022, 27 (2) : 1163-1178. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021085 [11] Fengqi Yi, Eamonn A. Gaffney, Sungrim Seirin-Lee. The bifurcation analysis of turing pattern formation induced by delay and diffusion in the Schnakenberg system. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2017, 22 (2) : 647-668. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2017031 [12] R.A. Satnoianu, Philip K. Maini, F.S. Garduno, J.P. Armitage. Travelling waves in a nonlinear degenerate diffusion model for bacterial pattern formation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2001, 1 (3) : 339-362. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2001.1.339 [13] Hongfei Xu, Jinfeng Wang, Xuelian Xu. Dynamics and pattern formation in a cross-diffusion model with stage structure for predators. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2021237 [14] Shangbing Ai, Wenzhang Huang, Zhi-An Wang. Reaction, diffusion and chemotaxis in wave propagation. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2015, 20 (1) : 1-21. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2015.20.1 [15] Anouar El Harrak, Amal Bergam, Tri Nguyen-Huu, Pierre Auger, Rachid Mchich. Application of aggregation of variables methods to a class of two-time reaction-diffusion-chemotaxis models of spatially structured populations with constant diffusion. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (7) : 2163-2181. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021055 [16] Kolade M. Owolabi. Numerical analysis and pattern formation process for space-fractional superdiffusive systems. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2019, 12 (3) : 543-566. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019036 [17] Hyung Ju Hwang, Thomas P. Witelski. Short-time pattern formation in thin film equations. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2009, 23 (3) : 867-885. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2009.23.867 [18] Hongyan Zhang, Siyu Liu, Yue Zhang. Dynamics and spatiotemporal pattern formations of a homogeneous reaction-diffusion Thomas model. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2017, 10 (5) : 1149-1164. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2017062 [19] Gaetana Gambino, Valeria Giunta, Maria Carmela Lombardo, Gianfranco Rubino. Cross-diffusion effects on stationary pattern formation in the FitzHugh-Nagumo model. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2022  doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2022063 [20] Jinfeng Wang, Sainan Wu, Junping Shi. Pattern formation in diffusive predator-prey systems with predator-taxis and prey-taxis. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2021, 26 (3) : 1273-1289. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2020162

2018 Impact Factor: 1.313