Discretized feedback control for systems of linearized hyperbolic balance laws

Stephan Gerster; Michael Herty

doi:10.3934/mcrf.2019024

Previous Article
A non-exponential discounting time-inconsistent stochastic optimal control problem for jump-diffusion
MCRF Home
This Issue
Next Article
Determining the shape of a solid of revolution

September 2019, 9(3): 517-539. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2019024

Discretized feedback control for systems of linearized hyperbolic balance laws

Stephan Gerster and Michael Herty

RWTH Aachen University, IGPM, Templergraben 55, 52062 Aachen, Germany

Received July 2017 Revised August 2018 Published April 2019

Fund Project: This work is supported by DFG HE5386/13-15.

Physical systems such as water and gas networks are usually operated in a state of equilibrium and feedback control is employed to damp small perturbations over time. We consider flow problems on networks, described by hyperbolic balance laws, and analyze the stability of the linearized systems. Sufficient conditions for exponential stability in the continuous and discretized setting are presented. The analysis is extended to arbitrary Sobolev norms. Computational experiments illustrate the theoretical findings.

Keywords: Systems of hyperbolic balance laws, feedback stabilization, Lyapunov function, isothermal Euler equations, shallow water equations.

Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 37L45, 93B52, 35B35; Secondary: 35B30, 93B18, 93C73, 93D15, 93D05.

Citation: Stephan Gerster, Michael Herty. Discretized feedback control for systems of linearized hyperbolic balance laws. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2019, 9 (3) : 517-539. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2019024

References:

[1]	M. K. Banda and M. Herty, Numerical discretization of stabilization problems with boundary controls for systems of hyperbolic conservation laws, Mathematical Control and Related Fields, 3 (2013), 121-142. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2013.3.121. Google Scholar
[2]	M. K. Banda, M. Herty and A. Klar, Gas flow in pipeline networks, Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 1 (2006), 41-56. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2006.1.41. Google Scholar
[3]	G. P. Barker, A. Berman and R. J. Plemmons, Positive diagonal solutions to the Lyapunov equations, Linear and Multilinear Algebra, 5 (1978), 249-256. doi: 10.1080/03081087808817203. Google Scholar
[4]	G. Bastin and J.-M. Coron, Stability and Boundary Stabilization of 1-d Hyperbolic Systems, 1st edition, Progress in nonlinear differential equations and their applications, Birkhäuser, Switzerland, 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-32062-5. Google Scholar
[5]	J.-M. Coron, Local controllability of a 1-d tank containing a fluid modeled by the shallow water equations, ESAIM: Control, Optim. and Calculus of Variations, 8 (2002), 513-554. doi: 10.1051/cocv:2002050. Google Scholar
[6]	J.-M. Coron, Control and Nonlinearity, vol. 136 of Mathematical surveys and monographs, Providence, RI, 2007. Google Scholar
[7]	J.-M. Coron and G. Bastin, Dissipative boundary conditions for one-dimensional quasilinear hyperbolic systems: Lyapunov stability for the $C^1$-norm, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 53 (2015), 1464-1483. doi: 10.1137/14097080X. Google Scholar
[8]	J.-M. Coron, G. Bastin and B. d'Andréa-Novel, A strict Lyapunov function for boundary control of hyperbolic systems of conservation laws, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 52 (2007), 2-11. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2006.887903. Google Scholar
[9]	J.-M. Coron, G. Bastin and B. d'Andréa-Novel, Boundary feedback control and Lyapunov stability analysis for physical networks of 2$\times$2 hyperbolic balance laws, Proceedings of the 47th IEEE Conference on decision and Control, (2008), 1454-1458. Google Scholar
[10]	J.-M. Coron, G. Bastin and B. d'Andréa-Novel, Dissipative boundary conditions for one-dimensional nonlinear hyperbolic systems, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 47 (2008), 1460-1498. doi: 10.1137/070706847. Google Scholar
[11]	J.-M. Coron, G. Bastin and B. d'Andréa-Novel, On Lyapunov stability of linearised Saint-Venant equations for a sloping channel, Networks and Heterog. Media, 4 (2009), 177-187. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2009.4.177. Google Scholar
[12]	J.-M. Coron, G. Bastin, B. d'Andréa-Novel and B. Haut, Lyapunov stability analysis of networks of scalar conservation laws, Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2 (2007), 751-759. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2007.2.751. Google Scholar
[13]	C. M. Dafermos, Hyperbolic Conservation Laws in Continuum Physics, 3rd edition, A series of comprehensive studies in mathematics, Springer, Providence, RI, 2010. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-04048-1. Google Scholar
[14]	J. de Halleux, C. Prieur, J.-M. Coron, B. d'Andréa-Novel and G. Bastin, Boundary feedback control in networks of open channels, Automatica, 39 (2003), 1365-1376. doi: 10.1016/S0005-1098(03)00109-2. Google Scholar
[15]	M. Dick, M. Gugat and G. Leugering, Classical solutions and feedback stabilization for the gas flow in a sequence of pipes, Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 5 (2010), 691-709. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2010.5.691. Google Scholar
[16]	M. Gugat and M. Herty, Existence of classical solutions and feedback stabilization for the flow in gas networks, ESAIM: Control, Optim. and Calculus of Variations, 17 (2011), 28-51. doi: 10.1051/cocv/2009035. Google Scholar
[17]	M. Gugat and G. Leugering, Global boundary controllability of the de St. Venant equations between steady states, Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincare (C) Non Linear Analysis, 20 (2003), 1-11. doi: 10.1016/S0294-1449(02)00004-5. Google Scholar
[18]	M. Gugat and G. Leugering, Global boundary controllability of the Saint-Venant system for sloped canals with friction, Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincare (C) Non Linear Analysis, 26 (2009), 257-270. doi: 10.1016/j.anihpc.2008.01.002. Google Scholar
[19]	M. Gugat, G. Leugering and G. Schmidt, Global controllability between steady supercritical flows in channel networks, Mathematical Methods in the Applied Science, 27 (2004), 781-802. doi: 10.1002/mma.471. Google Scholar
[20]	M. Gugat, G. Leugering, S. Tamasoiu and K. Wang, $H^2$-stabilization of the isothermal Euler equations: A Lyapunov function approach, Chin. Ann. Math., 33 (2012), 479-500. doi: 10.1007/s11401-012-0727-y. Google Scholar
[21]	M. Gugat, L. Rosier and V. Perrollaz, Boundary stabilization of quasilinear hyperbolic systems of balance laws: exponential decay for small source terms, Journal of Evolution Equations, 18 (2018), 1471-1500. doi: 10.1007/s00028-018-0449-z. Google Scholar
[22]	H. K. Khalil, Nonlinear Control, Pearson Education, 2015. Google Scholar
[23]	G. Leugering and G. Schmidt, On the modelling and stabilization of flows in networks of open canals, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 41 (2002), 164-180. doi: 10.1137/S0363012900375664. Google Scholar
[24]	R. J. Leveque, Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems, 1st edition, Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, 2002. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791253. Google Scholar
[25]	P. Schillen and S. Göttlich, Numerical discretization of boundary control problems for systems of balance laws: Feedback stabilization, European Journal of Control, 35 (2017), 11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcon.2017.02.002. Google Scholar
[26]	A. Zlotnik, M. Chertkov and S. Backhaus, Optimal control of transient flow in natural gas networks, 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), (2015), 4563-4570. doi: 10.1109/CDC.2015.7402932. Google Scholar

show all references

References:

[1]	M. K. Banda and M. Herty, Numerical discretization of stabilization problems with boundary controls for systems of hyperbolic conservation laws, Mathematical Control and Related Fields, 3 (2013), 121-142. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2013.3.121. Google Scholar
[2]	M. K. Banda, M. Herty and A. Klar, Gas flow in pipeline networks, Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 1 (2006), 41-56. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2006.1.41. Google Scholar
[3]	G. P. Barker, A. Berman and R. J. Plemmons, Positive diagonal solutions to the Lyapunov equations, Linear and Multilinear Algebra, 5 (1978), 249-256. doi: 10.1080/03081087808817203. Google Scholar
[4]	G. Bastin and J.-M. Coron, Stability and Boundary Stabilization of 1-d Hyperbolic Systems, 1st edition, Progress in nonlinear differential equations and their applications, Birkhäuser, Switzerland, 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-32062-5. Google Scholar
[5]	J.-M. Coron, Local controllability of a 1-d tank containing a fluid modeled by the shallow water equations, ESAIM: Control, Optim. and Calculus of Variations, 8 (2002), 513-554. doi: 10.1051/cocv:2002050. Google Scholar
[6]	J.-M. Coron, Control and Nonlinearity, vol. 136 of Mathematical surveys and monographs, Providence, RI, 2007. Google Scholar
[7]	J.-M. Coron and G. Bastin, Dissipative boundary conditions for one-dimensional quasilinear hyperbolic systems: Lyapunov stability for the $C^1$-norm, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 53 (2015), 1464-1483. doi: 10.1137/14097080X. Google Scholar
[8]	J.-M. Coron, G. Bastin and B. d'Andréa-Novel, A strict Lyapunov function for boundary control of hyperbolic systems of conservation laws, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 52 (2007), 2-11. doi: 10.1109/TAC.2006.887903. Google Scholar
[9]	J.-M. Coron, G. Bastin and B. d'Andréa-Novel, Boundary feedback control and Lyapunov stability analysis for physical networks of 2$\times$2 hyperbolic balance laws, Proceedings of the 47th IEEE Conference on decision and Control, (2008), 1454-1458. Google Scholar
[10]	J.-M. Coron, G. Bastin and B. d'Andréa-Novel, Dissipative boundary conditions for one-dimensional nonlinear hyperbolic systems, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 47 (2008), 1460-1498. doi: 10.1137/070706847. Google Scholar
[11]	J.-M. Coron, G. Bastin and B. d'Andréa-Novel, On Lyapunov stability of linearised Saint-Venant equations for a sloping channel, Networks and Heterog. Media, 4 (2009), 177-187. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2009.4.177. Google Scholar
[12]	J.-M. Coron, G. Bastin, B. d'Andréa-Novel and B. Haut, Lyapunov stability analysis of networks of scalar conservation laws, Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 2 (2007), 751-759. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2007.2.751. Google Scholar
[13]	C. M. Dafermos, Hyperbolic Conservation Laws in Continuum Physics, 3rd edition, A series of comprehensive studies in mathematics, Springer, Providence, RI, 2010. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-04048-1. Google Scholar
[14]	J. de Halleux, C. Prieur, J.-M. Coron, B. d'Andréa-Novel and G. Bastin, Boundary feedback control in networks of open channels, Automatica, 39 (2003), 1365-1376. doi: 10.1016/S0005-1098(03)00109-2. Google Scholar
[15]	M. Dick, M. Gugat and G. Leugering, Classical solutions and feedback stabilization for the gas flow in a sequence of pipes, Networks and Heterogeneous Media, 5 (2010), 691-709. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2010.5.691. Google Scholar
[16]	M. Gugat and M. Herty, Existence of classical solutions and feedback stabilization for the flow in gas networks, ESAIM: Control, Optim. and Calculus of Variations, 17 (2011), 28-51. doi: 10.1051/cocv/2009035. Google Scholar
[17]	M. Gugat and G. Leugering, Global boundary controllability of the de St. Venant equations between steady states, Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincare (C) Non Linear Analysis, 20 (2003), 1-11. doi: 10.1016/S0294-1449(02)00004-5. Google Scholar
[18]	M. Gugat and G. Leugering, Global boundary controllability of the Saint-Venant system for sloped canals with friction, Annales de l'Institut Henri Poincare (C) Non Linear Analysis, 26 (2009), 257-270. doi: 10.1016/j.anihpc.2008.01.002. Google Scholar
[19]	M. Gugat, G. Leugering and G. Schmidt, Global controllability between steady supercritical flows in channel networks, Mathematical Methods in the Applied Science, 27 (2004), 781-802. doi: 10.1002/mma.471. Google Scholar
[20]	M. Gugat, G. Leugering, S. Tamasoiu and K. Wang, $H^2$-stabilization of the isothermal Euler equations: A Lyapunov function approach, Chin. Ann. Math., 33 (2012), 479-500. doi: 10.1007/s11401-012-0727-y. Google Scholar
[21]	M. Gugat, L. Rosier and V. Perrollaz, Boundary stabilization of quasilinear hyperbolic systems of balance laws: exponential decay for small source terms, Journal of Evolution Equations, 18 (2018), 1471-1500. doi: 10.1007/s00028-018-0449-z. Google Scholar
[22]	H. K. Khalil, Nonlinear Control, Pearson Education, 2015. Google Scholar
[23]	G. Leugering and G. Schmidt, On the modelling and stabilization of flows in networks of open canals, SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 41 (2002), 164-180. doi: 10.1137/S0363012900375664. Google Scholar
[24]	R. J. Leveque, Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems, 1st edition, Cambridge Texts in Applied Mathematics, Cambridge University Press, 2002. doi: 10.1017/CBO9780511791253. Google Scholar
[25]	P. Schillen and S. Göttlich, Numerical discretization of boundary control problems for systems of balance laws: Feedback stabilization, European Journal of Control, 35 (2017), 11-18. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcon.2017.02.002. Google Scholar
[26]	A. Zlotnik, M. Chertkov and S. Backhaus, Optimal control of transient flow in natural gas networks, 54th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control (CDC), (2015), 4563-4570. doi: 10.1109/CDC.2015.7402932. Google Scholar

Figure 1. $ \log_2 $ of $ \hat{L}^1_x $-error for Riemann invariants

Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2. Lyapunov functions for $ {G = \mathbb{1}} $ and $ {\hat{\mu} = 0} $

Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3. Pipeline with two compressors and stability domain for the $ L^2 $-norm

Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4. Lyapunov functions for the steady states $ {\bar{h}(x): = 3} $ and $ {\bar{h}(x): = 3+10^{-3} \cos(2 \pi x)} $

Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5. Non-decaying Lyapunov functions for the steady state $ {\bar{h}(x): = 3+0.1 \cos(2 \pi x)} $

Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1. $\hat{L}^1_x$-error and EOS for Riemann invariants

	$\hat{L}^1_x$-error					EOC
△x	d=0	d=1	d=2	d=3	d=4	d=0	d=1	d=2	d=3	d=4
$2^{-4}$	0.52	3.61	24.11	146.27	953.65
$2^{-5}$	0.27	1.87	12.46	75.48	492.38	0.95	0.95	0.95	0.95	0.95
$2^{-6}$	0.13	0.94	6.27	37.97	247.28	0.99	0.99	0.99	0.99	0.99
$2^{-7}$	0.07	0.46	3.11	18.80	121.91	1.01	1.01	1.01	1.01	1.02
$2^{-8}$	0.03	0.23	1.51	9.12	58.63	1.04	1.04	1.04	1.04	1.06
$2^{-9}$	0.02	0.11	0.70	4.26	26.98	1.10	1.10	1.10	1.10	1.12

Table Options

Download as excel

	$\hat{L}^1_x$-error					EOC
△x	d=0	d=1	d=2	d=3	d=4	d=0	d=1	d=2	d=3	d=4
$2^{-4}$	0.52	3.61	24.11	146.27	953.65
$2^{-5}$	0.27	1.87	12.46	75.48	492.38	0.95	0.95	0.95	0.95	0.95
$2^{-6}$	0.13	0.94	6.27	37.97	247.28	0.99	0.99	0.99	0.99	0.99
$2^{-7}$	0.07	0.46	3.11	18.80	121.91	1.01	1.01	1.01	1.01	1.02
$2^{-8}$	0.03	0.23	1.51	9.12	58.63	1.04	1.04	1.04	1.04	1.06
$2^{-9}$	0.02	0.11	0.70	4.26	26.98	1.10	1.10	1.10	1.10	1.12

Table 2. Error of Lyapunov function for Euler]{$L^1_t$-, $L^2_t$-, $L^\infty_t$-error and EOC for Lyapunov functions, units in $0.01$

	${L_t^1\text{-error}}$					EOC
$\Delta x$	d=0	d=1	d=2	d=3	d=4	d=0	d=1	d=2	d=3	d=4
$2^{-4}$	6.90	7.08	7.08	7.08	7.00
$2^{-5}$	3.61	3.70	3.70	3.70	3.63	0.93	0.93	0.93	0.93	0.95
$2^{-6}$	1.84	1.88	1.88	1.88	1.81	0.98	0.98	0.98	0.98	1.00
$2^{-7}$	0.91	0.94	0.94	0.94	0.87	1.01	1.01	1.01	1.01	1.06
$2^{-8}$	0.45	0.46	0.46	0.46	0.39	1.04	1.04	1.04	1.04	1.17
$2^{-9}$	0.21	0.21	0.21	0.21	0.14	1.10	1.10	1.10	1.10	1.42

	${L_t^2\text{-error}}$					EOC
	d=0	d=1	d=2	d=3	d=4	d=0	d=1	d=2	d=3	d=4
$2^{-4}$	7.90	8.04	8.04	8.04	7.96
$2^{-5}$	4.15	4.23	4.23	4.23	4.15	0.93	0.93	0.93	0.93	0.94
$2^{-6}$	2.12	2.16	2.16	2.16	2.08	0.97	0.97	0.97	0.97	1.00
$2^{-7}$	1.06	1.08	1.08	1.07	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.06
$2^{-8}$	0.51	0.52	0.52	0.52	0.44	1.04	1.04	1.04	1.04	1.16
$2^{-9}$	0.24	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.17	1.09	1.09	1.09	1.09	1.42

	${L_t^\infty\text{-error}}$					EOC
$\Delta x$	d=0	d=1	d=2	d=3	d=4	d=0	d=1	d=2	d=3	d=4
$2^{-4}$	13.90	13.92	13.92	13.91	13.78
$2^{-5}$	7.41	7.43	7.43	7.42	7.29	0.91	0.91	0.91	0.91	0.92
$2^{-6}$	3.79	3.79	3.79	3.79	3.66	0.97	0.97	0.97	0.97	0.99
$2^{-7}$	1.87	1.87	1.87	1.87	1.74	1.02	1.02	1.02	1.02	1.07
$2^{-8}$	0.89	0.90	0.90	0.90	0.77	1.06	1.06	1.06	1.06	1.19
$2^{-9}$	0.42	0.42	0.42	0.42	0.29	1.09	1.09	1.09	1.09	1.40

Table Options

Download as excel

	${L_t^1\text{-error}}$					EOC
$\Delta x$	d=0	d=1	d=2	d=3	d=4	d=0	d=1	d=2	d=3	d=4
$2^{-4}$	6.90	7.08	7.08	7.08	7.00
$2^{-5}$	3.61	3.70	3.70	3.70	3.63	0.93	0.93	0.93	0.93	0.95
$2^{-6}$	1.84	1.88	1.88	1.88	1.81	0.98	0.98	0.98	0.98	1.00
$2^{-7}$	0.91	0.94	0.94	0.94	0.87	1.01	1.01	1.01	1.01	1.06
$2^{-8}$	0.45	0.46	0.46	0.46	0.39	1.04	1.04	1.04	1.04	1.17
$2^{-9}$	0.21	0.21	0.21	0.21	0.14	1.10	1.10	1.10	1.10	1.42

	${L_t^2\text{-error}}$					EOC
	d=0	d=1	d=2	d=3	d=4	d=0	d=1	d=2	d=3	d=4
$2^{-4}$	7.90	8.04	8.04	8.04	7.96
$2^{-5}$	4.15	4.23	4.23	4.23	4.15	0.93	0.93	0.93	0.93	0.94
$2^{-6}$	2.12	2.16	2.16	2.16	2.08	0.97	0.97	0.97	0.97	1.00
$2^{-7}$	1.06	1.08	1.08	1.07	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.00	1.06
$2^{-8}$	0.51	0.52	0.52	0.52	0.44	1.04	1.04	1.04	1.04	1.16
$2^{-9}$	0.24	0.25	0.25	0.25	0.17	1.09	1.09	1.09	1.09	1.42

	${L_t^\infty\text{-error}}$					EOC
$\Delta x$	d=0	d=1	d=2	d=3	d=4	d=0	d=1	d=2	d=3	d=4
$2^{-4}$	13.90	13.92	13.92	13.91	13.78
$2^{-5}$	7.41	7.43	7.43	7.42	7.29	0.91	0.91	0.91	0.91	0.92
$2^{-6}$	3.79	3.79	3.79	3.79	3.66	0.97	0.97	0.97	0.97	0.99
$2^{-7}$	1.87	1.87	1.87	1.87	1.74	1.02	1.02	1.02	1.02	1.07
$2^{-8}$	0.89	0.90	0.90	0.90	0.77	1.06	1.06	1.06	1.06	1.19
$2^{-9}$	0.42	0.42	0.42	0.42	0.29	1.09	1.09	1.09	1.09	1.40

Table 3. Estimated decay rate µ^e (top), guaranteed rate µ^g (middle) and observed rate µ^o (bottom) for $\mathsf{\hat{\mu }}$ : = 0.25 with constant and perturbed steady states

Estimated rate
	constant	p=4	p=3	p=2	p=1
d=0	0.2499	0.2498	0.2485	0.2254	-0.1563
d=1	0.2499	0.2495	0.2420	0.0374	-2.2991
d=2	0.2499	0.2458	0.1288	-1.3167	-15.8406
Guaranteed rate
	constant	p=4	p=3	p=2	p=1
d=0	0.2499	0.2498	0.2487	0.2279	-0.1154
d=1	0.2499	0.2495	0.2428	0.0591	-2.0424
d=2	0.2499	0.2463	0.1412	-1.1566	-14.2202
Observed rate
	constant	p=4	p=3	p=2	p=1
d=0	0.2572	0.2572	0.2572	0.2537	0.1343
d=1	0.3461	0.3459	0.3416	0.2126	-1.3244
d=2	0.2632	0.2615	0.2089	-0.6659	-10.7687

Table Options

Download as excel

Estimated rate
	constant	p=4	p=3	p=2	p=1
d=0	0.2499	0.2498	0.2485	0.2254	-0.1563
d=1	0.2499	0.2495	0.2420	0.0374	-2.2991
d=2	0.2499	0.2458	0.1288	-1.3167	-15.8406
Guaranteed rate
	constant	p=4	p=3	p=2	p=1
d=0	0.2499	0.2498	0.2487	0.2279	-0.1154
d=1	0.2499	0.2495	0.2428	0.0591	-2.0424
d=2	0.2499	0.2463	0.1412	-1.1566	-14.2202
Observed rate
	constant	p=4	p=3	p=2	p=1
d=0	0.2572	0.2572	0.2572	0.2537	0.1343
d=1	0.3461	0.3459	0.3416	0.2126	-1.3244
d=2	0.2632	0.2615	0.2089	-0.6659	-10.7687

[1]	Markus Dick, Martin Gugat, Günter Leugering. A strict $H^1$-Lyapunov function and feedback stabilization for the isothermal Euler equations with friction. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2011, 1 (2) : 225-244. doi: 10.3934/naco.2011.1.225
[2]	Martin Gugat, Markus Dick. Time-delayed boundary feedback stabilization of the isothermal Euler equations with friction. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2011, 1 (4) : 469-491. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2011.1.469
[3]	Constantine M. Dafermos. Hyperbolic balance laws with relaxation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2016, 36 (8) : 4271-4285. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2016.36.4271
[4]	Yanni Zeng. L^P decay for general hyperbolic-parabolic systems of balance laws. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2018, 38 (1) : 363-396. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018018
[5]	Tobias Breiten, Karl Kunisch. Feedback stabilization of the three-dimensional Navier-Stokes equations using generalized Lyapunov equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2020, 40 (7) : 4197-4229. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020178
[6]	Ilyasse Lamrani, Imad El Harraki, Ali Boutoulout, Fatima-Zahrae El Alaoui. Feedback stabilization of bilinear coupled hyperbolic systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (10) : 3641-3657. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020434
[7]	Cătălin-George Lefter, Elena-Alexandra Melnig. Feedback stabilization with one simultaneous control for systems of parabolic equations. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2018, 8 (3&4) : 777-787. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2018034
[8]	Tobias Breiten, Karl Kunisch. Boundary feedback stabilization of the monodomain equations. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2017, 7 (3) : 369-391. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2017013
[9]	C. M. Khalique, G. S. Pai. Conservation laws and invariant solutions for soil water equations. Conference Publications, 2003, 2003 (Special) : 477-481. doi: 10.3934/proc.2003.2003.477
[10]	Mapundi K. Banda, Michael Herty. Numerical discretization of stabilization problems with boundary controls for systems of hyperbolic conservation laws. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2013, 3 (2) : 121-142. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2013.3.121
[11]	Manwai Yuen. Cylindrical blowup solutions to the isothermal Euler-Poisson equations. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 1448-1456. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.1448
[12]	Yanbo Hu, Tong Li. The regularity of a degenerate Goursat problem for the 2-D isothermal Euler equations. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2019, 18 (6) : 3317-3336. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2019149
[13]	Mapundi K. Banda, Michael Herty, Axel Klar. Coupling conditions for gas networks governed by the isothermal Euler equations. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2006, 1 (2) : 295-314. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2006.1.295
[14]	Rinaldo M. Colombo, Graziano Guerra. Hyperbolic balance laws with a dissipative non local source. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2008, 7 (5) : 1077-1090. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2008.7.1077
[15]	Martin Gugat, Günter Leugering, Ke Wang. Neumann boundary feedback stabilization for a nonlinear wave equation: A strict $H^2$-lyapunov function. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2017, 7 (3) : 419-448. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2017015
[16]	Madalina Petcu, Roger Temam. The one dimensional shallow water equations with Dirichlet boundary conditions on the velocity. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2011, 4 (1) : 209-222. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.209
[17]	Zhigang Wang. Vanishing viscosity limit of the rotating shallow water equations with far field vacuum. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2018, 38 (1) : 311-328. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2018015
[18]	Chengchun Hao. Cauchy problem for viscous shallow water equations with surface tension. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 13 (3) : 593-608. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.13.593
[19]	Denys Dutykh, Dimitrios Mitsotakis. On the relevance of the dam break problem in the context of nonlinear shallow water equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 13 (4) : 799-818. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.13.799
[20]	Werner Bauer, François Gay-Balmaz. Towards a geometric variational discretization of compressible fluids: The rotating shallow water equations. Journal of Computational Dynamics, 2019, 6 (1) : 1-37. doi: 10.3934/jcd.2019001

2020 Impact Factor: 1.284

Tools

Metrics

Tools

Article outline

Figures and Tables

2020 Impact Factor: 1.284

Tools

Figures and Tables

2020 Impact Factor: 1.284

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Discretized feedback control for systems of linearized hyperbolic balance laws

References:

References:

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

Tools

Tools

Tools

Metrics

Other articles
by authors

American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Discretized feedback control for systems of linearized hyperbolic balance laws

References:

References:

Tools

Metrics

Other articlesby authors

Tools

Tools

Tools

Metrics

Other articlesby authors

Other articles
by authors

Other articles
by authors