American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021017

Second order directional shape derivatives of integrals on submanifolds

Anton Schiela , and  Julian Ortiz

Universität Bayreuth, 95440 Bayreuth, Germany

* Corresponding author: Anton Schiela

Received  February 2019 Revised  October 2019 Published  March 2021

Fund Project: This work was supported by DFG grant SCHI 1379/3-1

We compute first and second order shape sensitivities of integrals on smooth submanifolds using a variant of shape differentiation. The result is a quadratic form in terms of one perturbation vector field that yields a second order quadratic model of the perturbed functional. We discuss the structure of this derivative, derive domain expressions and Hadamard forms in a general geometric framework, and give a detailed geometric interpretation of the arising terms.

Keywords: Shape optimization, shape derivative, shape hessian, submanifolds.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 53A07, 49Q10, 49Q12.
Citation: Anton Schiela, Julian Ortiz. Second order directional shape derivatives of integrals on submanifolds. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021017
References:
[1]

D. Bucur and J.-P. Zolésio, Anatomy of the shape Hessian via Lie brackets, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., 173 (1997), 127-143.  doi: 10.1007/BF01783465.  Google Scholar

[2]

M. C. Delfour and J.-P. Zolésio, Shapes and Geometries: Metrics, Analysis, Differential Calculus, and Optimization, 22 of Advances in Design and Control, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, second edition, 2011. doi: 10.1137/1.9780898719826.  Google Scholar

[3]

F. R. Desaint and J.-P. Zolésio, Manifold derivative in the Laplace-Beltrami equation, J. Funct. Anal., 151 (1997), 234-269.  doi: 10.1006/jfan.1997.3130.  Google Scholar

[4]

A. Henrot and M. Pierre, Variation et Optimisation de Formes, Une Analyse Géométrique, 48 of Mathématiques & Applications (Berlin), Springer, Berlin, 2005. doi: 10.1007/3-540-37689-5.  Google Scholar

[5]

M. Hintermüller and W. Ring, A second order shape optimization approach for image segmentation, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 64 (2003/04), 442-467.  doi: 10.1137/S0036139902403901.  Google Scholar

[6]

R. Hiptmair and J. Li, Shape derivatives in differential forms I: An intrinsic perspective, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., 192 (2013), 1077-1098.  doi: 10.1007/s10231-012-0259-9.  Google Scholar

[7]

S. Lang, Fundamentals of Differential Geometry, 191 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0541-8.  Google Scholar

[8]

F. Murat and J. Simon, Etudes de problems d'optimal design, Lectures Notes in Computer Science, 41 (1976), 54-62.   Google Scholar

[9]

A. Novruzi and M. Pierre, Structure of shape derivatives, J. Evol. Equ., 2 (2002), 365-382.  doi: 10.1007/s00028-002-8093-y.  Google Scholar

[10]

V. H. Schulz, A Riemannian view on shape optimization, Found. Comput. Math., 14 (2014), 483-501.  doi: 10.1007/s10208-014-9200-5.  Google Scholar

[11]

J. Simon, Second variation for domain optimization problems. control and estimation of distributed parameter systems, International Series of Numerical Mathematics, 91, Birkhäuser, Basel, 1989,361–378.  Google Scholar

[12]

J. Sokołowski and J.-P. Zolésio, Introduction to Shape Optimization, Shape Sensitivity Analysis, 16 of Springer Series in Computational Mathematics., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-58106-9.  Google Scholar

[13]

M. Spivak, A comprehensive Introduction to Differential Geometry. Vol. III, Publish or Perish, Inc., Wilmington, Del., second edition, 1979.  Google Scholar

[14]

K. Sturm, Convergence of Newton's method in shape optimisation via approximate normal functions, Technical Report arXiv: 1608.02699, arXiv, 2016. Google Scholar

[15]

K. Sturm, A structure theorem for shape functions defined on submanifolds, Interfaces Free Bound., 18 (2016), 523-543.  doi: 10.4171/IFB/372.  Google Scholar

[16]

L. Younes, Shapes and Diffeomorphisms, 171 of Applied Mathematical Sciences., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2010. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-12055-8.  Google Scholar

[17]

J.-P. Zolésio, Un résultat d'existence de vitesse convergente dans des problèmes d'identification de domaine, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. A-B, 283 (1976), Aiii, A855–A858.  Google Scholar

[18]

J.-P. Zolésio, The material derivative (or speed) method for shape optimization, In Optimization of distributed parameter structures, Vol. II (Iowa City, Iowa, 1980), 50 of NATO Adv. Study Inst. Ser. E: Appl. Sci., Nijhoff, The Hague, 1981, 1089–1151.  Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

D. Bucur and J.-P. Zolésio, Anatomy of the shape Hessian via Lie brackets, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., 173 (1997), 127-143.  doi: 10.1007/BF01783465.  Google Scholar

[2]

M. C. Delfour and J.-P. Zolésio, Shapes and Geometries: Metrics, Analysis, Differential Calculus, and Optimization, 22 of Advances in Design and Control, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics (SIAM), Philadelphia, PA, second edition, 2011. doi: 10.1137/1.9780898719826.  Google Scholar

[3]

F. R. Desaint and J.-P. Zolésio, Manifold derivative in the Laplace-Beltrami equation, J. Funct. Anal., 151 (1997), 234-269.  doi: 10.1006/jfan.1997.3130.  Google Scholar

[4]

A. Henrot and M. Pierre, Variation et Optimisation de Formes, Une Analyse Géométrique, 48 of Mathématiques & Applications (Berlin), Springer, Berlin, 2005. doi: 10.1007/3-540-37689-5.  Google Scholar

[5]

M. Hintermüller and W. Ring, A second order shape optimization approach for image segmentation, SIAM J. Appl. Math., 64 (2003/04), 442-467.  doi: 10.1137/S0036139902403901.  Google Scholar

[6]

R. Hiptmair and J. Li, Shape derivatives in differential forms I: An intrinsic perspective, Ann. Mat. Pura Appl., 192 (2013), 1077-1098.  doi: 10.1007/s10231-012-0259-9.  Google Scholar

[7]

S. Lang, Fundamentals of Differential Geometry, 191 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics., Springer-Verlag, New York, 1999. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4612-0541-8.  Google Scholar

[8]

F. Murat and J. Simon, Etudes de problems d'optimal design, Lectures Notes in Computer Science, 41 (1976), 54-62.   Google Scholar

[9]

A. Novruzi and M. Pierre, Structure of shape derivatives, J. Evol. Equ., 2 (2002), 365-382.  doi: 10.1007/s00028-002-8093-y.  Google Scholar

[10]

V. H. Schulz, A Riemannian view on shape optimization, Found. Comput. Math., 14 (2014), 483-501.  doi: 10.1007/s10208-014-9200-5.  Google Scholar

[11]

J. Simon, Second variation for domain optimization problems. control and estimation of distributed parameter systems, International Series of Numerical Mathematics, 91, Birkhäuser, Basel, 1989,361–378.  Google Scholar

[12]

J. Sokołowski and J.-P. Zolésio, Introduction to Shape Optimization, Shape Sensitivity Analysis, 16 of Springer Series in Computational Mathematics., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1992. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-58106-9.  Google Scholar

[13]

M. Spivak, A comprehensive Introduction to Differential Geometry. Vol. III, Publish or Perish, Inc., Wilmington, Del., second edition, 1979.  Google Scholar

[14]

K. Sturm, Convergence of Newton's method in shape optimisation via approximate normal functions, Technical Report arXiv: 1608.02699, arXiv, 2016. Google Scholar

[15]

K. Sturm, A structure theorem for shape functions defined on submanifolds, Interfaces Free Bound., 18 (2016), 523-543.  doi: 10.4171/IFB/372.  Google Scholar

[16]

L. Younes, Shapes and Diffeomorphisms, 171 of Applied Mathematical Sciences., Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2010. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-12055-8.  Google Scholar

[17]

J.-P. Zolésio, Un résultat d'existence de vitesse convergente dans des problèmes d'identification de domaine, C. R. Acad. Sci. Paris Sér. A-B, 283 (1976), Aiii, A855–A858.  Google Scholar

[18]

J.-P. Zolésio, The material derivative (or speed) method for shape optimization, In Optimization of distributed parameter structures, Vol. II (Iowa City, Iowa, 1980), 50 of NATO Adv. Study Inst. Ser. E: Appl. Sci., Nijhoff, The Hague, 1981, 1089–1151.  Google Scholar

[1]

Barbara Kaltenbacher, Gunther Peichl. The shape derivative for an optimization problem in lithotripsy. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2016, 5 (3) : 399-430. doi: 10.3934/eect.2016011
[2]

Barbara Brandolini, Carlo Nitsch, Cristina Trombetti. Shape optimization for Monge-Ampère equations via domain derivative. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2011, 4 (4) : 825-831. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2011.4.825
[3]

Wenya Ma, Yihang Hao, Xiangao Liu. Shape optimization in compressible liquid crystals. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2015, 14 (5) : 1623-1639. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2015.14.1623
[4]

Lekbir Afraites, Chorouk Masnaoui, Mourad Nachaoui. Shape optimization method for an inverse geometric source problem and stability at critical shape. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021  doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021006
[5]

Markus Muhr, Vanja Nikolić, Barbara Wohlmuth, Linus Wunderlich. Isogeometric shape optimization for nonlinear ultrasound focusing. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2019, 8 (1) : 163-202. doi: 10.3934/eect.2019010
[6]

Benedict Geihe, Martin Rumpf. A posteriori error estimates for sequential laminates in shape optimization. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2016, 9 (5) : 1377-1392. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2016055
[7]

Günter Leugering, Jan Sokołowski, Antoni Żochowski. Control of crack propagation by shape-topological optimization. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2015, 35 (6) : 2625-2657. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2015.35.2625
[8]

Amin Boumenir. Determining the shape of a solid of revolution. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2019, 9 (3) : 509-515. doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2019023
[9]

Jaroslav Haslinger, Raino A. E. Mäkinen, Jan Stebel. Shape optimization for Stokes problem with threshold slip boundary conditions. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2017, 10 (6) : 1281-1301. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2017069
[10]

Lekbir Afraites, Marc Dambrine, Karsten Eppler, Djalil Kateb. Detecting perfectly insulated obstacles by shape optimization techniques of order two. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2007, 8 (2) : 389-416. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2007.8.389
[11]

Jan Sokołowski, Jan Stebel. Shape optimization for non-Newtonian fluids in time-dependent domains. Evolution Equations & Control Theory, 2014, 3 (2) : 331-348. doi: 10.3934/eect.2014.3.331
[12]

Afaf Bouharguane, Pascal Azerad, Frédéric Bouchette, Fabien Marche, Bijan Mohammadi. Low complexity shape optimization & a posteriori high fidelity validation. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2010, 13 (4) : 759-772. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2010.13.759
[13]

Alberto Bressan, Sondre Tesdal Galtung. A 2-dimensional shape optimization problem for tree branches. Networks & Heterogeneous Media, 2021, 16 (1) : 1-29. doi: 10.3934/nhm.2020031
[14]

Andrzej Nowakowski, Jan Sokolowski. On dual dynamic programming in shape control. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2012, 11 (6) : 2473-2485. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2012.11.2473
[15]

Martin Bauer, Philipp Harms, Peter W. Michor. Sobolev metrics on shape space of surfaces. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2011, 3 (4) : 389-438. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2011.3.389
[16]

Julius Fergy T. Rabago, Jerico B. Bacani. Shape optimization approach for solving the Bernoulli problem by tracking the Neumann data: A Lagrangian formulation. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2018, 17 (6) : 2683-2702. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2018127
[17]

Michel Frémond, Elisabetta Rocca. A model for shape memory alloys with the possibility of voids. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2010, 27 (4) : 1633-1659. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.27.1633
[18]

Ville Kolehmainen, Matti Lassas, Petri Ola, Samuli Siltanen. Recovering boundary shape and conductivity in electrical impedance tomography. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2013, 7 (1) : 217-242. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.217
[19]

Elena Celledoni, Markus Eslitzbichler, Alexander Schmeding. Shape analysis on Lie groups with applications in computer animation. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2016, 8 (3) : 273-304. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2016008
[20]

Xavier Dubois de La Sablonière, Benjamin Mauroy, Yannick Privat. Shape minimization of the dissipated energy in dyadic trees. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - B, 2011, 16 (3) : 767-799. doi: 10.3934/dcdsb.2011.16.767

2019 Impact Factor: 0.857

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (17)
  • HTML views (78)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2021 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences