American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

Advanced
November  2020, 3(4): 279-300. doi: 10.3934/mfc.2020018

Support vector machine classifiers by non-Euclidean margins

Ying Lin and  Qi Ye ,

School of Mathematical Sciences, South China Normal University, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510631, China

* Corresponding author: Qi Ye

Received  January 2020 Revised  May 2020 Published  November 2020 Early access  June 2020

Fund Project: The first author is supported by the Innovation Project of Graduate School of South China Normal University. The second author is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province (2019A1515011995, 2020B1515310013) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (11931003)

In this article, the classical support vector machine (SVM) classifiers are generalized by the non-Euclidean margins. We first extend the linear models of the SVM classifiers by the non-Euclidean margins including the theorems and algorithms of the SVM classifiers by the hard margins and the soft margins. Specially, the SVM classifiers by the $ \infty $-norm margins can be solved by the 1-norm optimization with sparsity. Next, we show that the non-linear models of the SVM classifiers by the $ q $-norm margins can be equivalently transferred to the SVM in the $ p $-norm reproducing kernel Banach spaces given by the hinge loss, where $ 1/p+1/q = 1 $. Finally, we illustrate the numerical examples of artificial data and real data to compare the different algorithms of the SVM classifiers by the $ \infty $-norm margin.

Keywords: Support vector machine classifier, non-euclidean margin, reproducing kernel Banach space.
Mathematics Subject Classification: Primary: 46E22, 62G08; Secondary: 68Q32.
Citation: Ying Lin, Qi Ye. Support vector machine classifiers by non-Euclidean margins. Mathematical Foundations of Computing, 2020, 3 (4) : 279-300. doi: 10.3934/mfc.2020018
References:
[1]

B. E. Boser, I. M. Guyon and V. N. Vapnik, A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers, in Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational learning theory, ACM, (1992), 144–152. doi: 10.1145/130385.130401.  Google Scholar

[2]

P. Bühlmann and S. van de Geer, Statistics for High-Dimensional Data. Methods, Theory and Applications, Springer Series in Statistics, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-20192-9.  Google Scholar

[3]

L. Chen and H. Zhang, Statistical margin error bounds for l1-norm support vector machines, Neurocomputing, 339 (2019), 210-216.  doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.02.015.  Google Scholar

[4]

C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, Support-vector networks, Machine Learning, 20 (1995), 273-297.  doi: 10.1007/BF00994018.  Google Scholar

[5]

R. Der and D. Lee, Large-margin classification in banach spaces, Journal of Machine Learning Research - Proceedings Track, 2 (2007), 91-98.   Google Scholar

[6] I. Ekeland and T. Turnbull, Infinite-Dimensional Optimization and Convexity, Chicago Lectures in Mathematics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1983.   Google Scholar
[7] T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani and M. Wainwright, Statistical Learning with Sparsity: The Lasso and Generalizations, Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, 143. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2015.   Google Scholar
[8]

L. Huang, C. Liu, L. Tan and Q. Ye, Generalized representer theorems in Banach spaces, Anal. Appl. (Singap.), (2019). doi: 10.1142/S0219530519410100.  Google Scholar

[9]

O. L. Mangasarian, Arbitrary-norm separating plane, Operations Research Letters, 24 (1999), 15-23.  doi: 10.1016/S0167-6377(98)00049-2.  Google Scholar

[10]

J. Platt, Sequential minimal optimization: A fast algorithm for training support vector machines., Google Scholar

[11]

L. Q. Qi, H. B. Chen and Y. N.Chen, Tensor Eigenvalues and Their Applications, Advances in Mechanics and Mathematics, 39. Springer, Singapore, 2018. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-8058-6.  Google Scholar

[12] R. T. Rockafellar, Convex Analysis, Princeton Mathematical Series, No. 28, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1970.   Google Scholar
[13] B. Schölkopf and A. J. Smola, Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 2001.   Google Scholar
[14]

G. H. Song and H. Z. Zhang, Reproducing kernel Banach spaces with the $\ell^1$ norm Ⅱ: Error analysis for regularized least square regression, Neural Comput., 23 (2011), 2713-2729.  doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00178.  Google Scholar

[15]

G. H. Song, H. Z. Zhang and F. J. Hickernell, Reproducing kernel Banach spaces with the $\ell^1$ norm, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 34 (2013), 96-116.  doi: 10.1016/j.acha.2012.03.009.  Google Scholar

[16]

I. Steinwart and A. Christmann, Support Vector Machines, Information Science and Statistics, Springer, New York, 2008.  Google Scholar

[17]

V. N. Vapnik, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0.  Google Scholar

[18]

Y. S. Xu and Q. Ye, Generalized mercer kernels and reproducing kernel banach spaces, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 258 (2019). doi: 10.1090/memo/1243.  Google Scholar

[19]

H. Yang, X. Yang, F. Zhang, Q. Ye and X. Fan, Infinite norm large margin classifier, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 10 (2019), 2449-2457.  doi: 10.1007/s13042-018-0881-y.  Google Scholar

[20]

H. Z. Zhang, Y. S. Xu and J. Zhang, Reproducing kernel Banach spaces for machine learning, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 10 (2009), 2741-2775.  doi: 10.1109/IJCNN.2009.5179093.  Google Scholar

[21]

L. Zhang and W. Zhou, On the sparseness of 1-norm support vector machines, Neural Networks, 23 (2010), 373-385.  doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2009.11.012.  Google Scholar

[22]

J. Zhu, S. Rosset, R. Tibshirani and T. J. Hastie, 1-norm support vector machines, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, (2004), 49–56. Google Scholar

show all references

References:
[1]

B. E. Boser, I. M. Guyon and V. N. Vapnik, A training algorithm for optimal margin classifiers, in Proceedings of the Fifth Annual Workshop on Computational learning theory, ACM, (1992), 144–152. doi: 10.1145/130385.130401.  Google Scholar

[2]

P. Bühlmann and S. van de Geer, Statistics for High-Dimensional Data. Methods, Theory and Applications, Springer Series in Statistics, Springer, Heidelberg, 2011. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-20192-9.  Google Scholar

[3]

L. Chen and H. Zhang, Statistical margin error bounds for l1-norm support vector machines, Neurocomputing, 339 (2019), 210-216.  doi: 10.1016/j.neucom.2019.02.015.  Google Scholar

[4]

C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, Support-vector networks, Machine Learning, 20 (1995), 273-297.  doi: 10.1007/BF00994018.  Google Scholar

[5]

R. Der and D. Lee, Large-margin classification in banach spaces, Journal of Machine Learning Research - Proceedings Track, 2 (2007), 91-98.   Google Scholar

[6] I. Ekeland and T. Turnbull, Infinite-Dimensional Optimization and Convexity, Chicago Lectures in Mathematics, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, 1983.   Google Scholar
[7] T. Hastie, R. Tibshirani and M. Wainwright, Statistical Learning with Sparsity: The Lasso and Generalizations, Monographs on Statistics and Applied Probability, 143. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2015.   Google Scholar
[8]

L. Huang, C. Liu, L. Tan and Q. Ye, Generalized representer theorems in Banach spaces, Anal. Appl. (Singap.), (2019). doi: 10.1142/S0219530519410100.  Google Scholar

[9]

O. L. Mangasarian, Arbitrary-norm separating plane, Operations Research Letters, 24 (1999), 15-23.  doi: 10.1016/S0167-6377(98)00049-2.  Google Scholar

[10]

J. Platt, Sequential minimal optimization: A fast algorithm for training support vector machines., Google Scholar

[11]

L. Q. Qi, H. B. Chen and Y. N.Chen, Tensor Eigenvalues and Their Applications, Advances in Mechanics and Mathematics, 39. Springer, Singapore, 2018. doi: 10.1007/978-981-10-8058-6.  Google Scholar

[12] R. T. Rockafellar, Convex Analysis, Princeton Mathematical Series, No. 28, Princeton University Press, Princeton, N.J., 1970.   Google Scholar
[13] B. Schölkopf and A. J. Smola, Learning with Kernels: Support Vector Machines, Regularization, Optimization, and Beyond, The MIT Press, Cambridge, 2001.   Google Scholar
[14]

G. H. Song and H. Z. Zhang, Reproducing kernel Banach spaces with the $\ell^1$ norm Ⅱ: Error analysis for regularized least square regression, Neural Comput., 23 (2011), 2713-2729.  doi: 10.1162/NECO_a_00178.  Google Scholar

[15]

G. H. Song, H. Z. Zhang and F. J. Hickernell, Reproducing kernel Banach spaces with the $\ell^1$ norm, Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal., 34 (2013), 96-116.  doi: 10.1016/j.acha.2012.03.009.  Google Scholar

[16]

I. Steinwart and A. Christmann, Support Vector Machines, Information Science and Statistics, Springer, New York, 2008.  Google Scholar

[17]

V. N. Vapnik, The Nature of Statistical Learning Theory, Springer-Verlag, New York, 1995. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4757-2440-0.  Google Scholar

[18]

Y. S. Xu and Q. Ye, Generalized mercer kernels and reproducing kernel banach spaces, Mem. Amer. Math. Soc., 258 (2019). doi: 10.1090/memo/1243.  Google Scholar

[19]

H. Yang, X. Yang, F. Zhang, Q. Ye and X. Fan, Infinite norm large margin classifier, International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics, 10 (2019), 2449-2457.  doi: 10.1007/s13042-018-0881-y.  Google Scholar

[20]

H. Z. Zhang, Y. S. Xu and J. Zhang, Reproducing kernel Banach spaces for machine learning, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 10 (2009), 2741-2775.  doi: 10.1109/IJCNN.2009.5179093.  Google Scholar

[21]

L. Zhang and W. Zhou, On the sparseness of 1-norm support vector machines, Neural Networks, 23 (2010), 373-385.  doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2009.11.012.  Google Scholar

[22]

J. Zhu, S. Rosset, R. Tibshirani and T. J. Hastie, 1-norm support vector machines, in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, (2004), 49–56. Google Scholar

Figure 1.  Examples of Euclidean margins and non-Euclidean margins are illustrated. The black line is the decision boundary. The distance of the gap between the two red dashed lines is the margin. We can see the difference between these two classifiers
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 2.  The difference between hard margin and soft margin solutions
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 12.  The geometrical interpretation of distance from a point to a plane
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 3.  Maximal margin classifiers by 2 norm and $ \infty $ norm in the case of 2 distinct points. We can see the difference between the abilities to obtain sparsity
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 4.  The geometric explanation for infinite solutions for the SVM classifier by $ \infty $-norm margin
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 5.  The geometric explanation for unique solution for the SVM classifier by $ \infty $-norm margin
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 6a. After the feature mapping using kernel function, the data set is linear separable in higher dimensional space, see Figure 6b. Finally, the decision boundary in higher dimensional space can be projected into the original space and becomes the non-linear boundary in the original space">Figure 6.  The geometrical interpretation of the kernel tricks. In the original space, the data set is not linear separable, see Figure 6a. After the feature mapping using kernel function, the data set is linear separable in higher dimensional space, see Figure 6b. Finally, the decision boundary in higher dimensional space can be projected into the original space and becomes the non-linear boundary in the original space
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 7.  Noiseless and noisy data sets. The classes overlaps in noisy data set
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 8.  Three classifiers obtained by three different optimizations when $ C = 0.5 $, $ \lambda = 2 $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 9.  Two classifiers obtained by two different optimizations when $ C = 0.1 $, $ \lambda = 10 $
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 10.  The comparison between handwritten digits 6 and 9. The first row is 6 and the second row is 9
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Figure 11.  The comparison between handwritten alphabets O and Q. The first row is O and the second row is Q
Figure Options

Download full-size image

Download as PowerPoint slide

Table 1.  The results of experiments on MNIST. The row Linear SVM classifier by ∞-norm margin is the result obtained by (9) where $ \lambda = 0.1 $. The row Kernel SVM classifier by ∞-norm margin is the result obtained by (15) where $ \lambda = 0.1 $. The kernel function used here is Gaussian kernel $ K(\boldsymbol x, \boldsymbol x') = \exp \frac{-\|\boldsymbol x- \boldsymbol x'\|_{2}^{2}}{\sigma^2} $ where $ \sigma = 9.6 $
MNIST Training Errors Test Errors Sparsity
Linear SVM classifier by ∞-norm margin 0/9939 5/1967 654/785
Kernel SVM classifier by ∞-norm margin 0/9939 4/1967 1760/9939
Table Options

Download as excel

MNIST Training Errors Test Errors Sparsity
Linear SVM classifier by ∞-norm margin 0/9939 5/1967 654/785
Kernel SVM classifier by ∞-norm margin 0/9939 4/1967 1760/9939
Table 2.  The results of experiments on Handwritten Alphabets Database. The row Linear SVM classifier by ∞-norm margin is the result obtained by (9) where $ \lambda = 0.001 $. The row Kernel SVM classifier by ∞-norm margin is the result obtained by (15) where $ \lambda = 0.001 $. The kernel function used here is Gaussian kernel $ K(\boldsymbol x, \boldsymbol x') = \exp \frac{-\|\boldsymbol x- \boldsymbol x'\|_{2}^{2}}{\sigma^2} $ where $ \sigma = 2600 $
Handwritten Alphabets Training Errors Test Errors Sparsity
Linear SVM> classifier by ∞-norm margin 0/7000 69/3000 401/785
Kernel SVM classifier by ∞-norm margin 0/7000 14/3000 1339/7000
Table Options

Download as excel

Handwritten Alphabets Training Errors Test Errors Sparsity
Linear SVM> classifier by ∞-norm margin 0/7000 69/3000 401/785
Kernel SVM classifier by ∞-norm margin 0/7000 14/3000 1339/7000
[1]

Xin Yan, Hongmiao Zhu. A kernel-free fuzzy support vector machine with Universum. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021184
[2]

Herbert Koch. Partial differential equations with non-Euclidean geometries. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2008, 1 (3) : 481-504. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2008.1.481
[3]

Liming Yang, Yannan Chao. A new semi-supervised classifier based on maximum vector-angular margin. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (2) : 609-622. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016035
[4]

Yubo Yuan, Weiguo Fan, Dongmei Pu. Spline function smooth support vector machine for classification. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2007, 3 (3) : 529-542. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2007.3.529
[5]

Yubo Yuan. Canonical duality solution for alternating support vector machine. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2012, 8 (3) : 611-621. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2012.8.611
[6]

Ye Tian, Wei Yang, Gene Lai, Menghan Zhao. Predicting non-life insurer's insolvency using non-kernel fuzzy quadratic surface support vector machines. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (2) : 985-999. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018081
[7]

Ying Lin, Rongrong Lin, Qi Ye. Sparse regularized learning in the reproducing kernel banach spaces with the $ \ell^1 $ norm. Mathematical Foundations of Computing, 2020, 3 (3) : 205-218. doi: 10.3934/mfc.2020020
[8]

Jian Luo, Shu-Cherng Fang, Yanqin Bai, Zhibin Deng. Fuzzy quadratic surface support vector machine based on fisher discriminant analysis. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2016, 12 (1) : 357-373. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016.12.357
[9]

Xin Li, Ziguan Cui, Linhui Sun, Guanming Lu, Debnath Narayan. Research on iterative repair algorithm of Hyperchaotic image based on support vector machine. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2019, 12 (4&5) : 1199-1218. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019083
[10]

Ahmad Mousavi, Zheming Gao, Lanshan Han, Alvin Lim. Quadratic surface support vector machine with L1 norm regularization. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021046
[11]

Fatemeh Bazikar, Saeed Ketabchi, Hossein Moosaei. Smooth augmented Lagrangian method for twin bounded support vector machine. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021  doi: 10.3934/naco.2021027
[12]

Kaitlyn (Voccola) Muller. A reproducing kernel Hilbert space framework for inverse scattering problems within the Born approximation. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2019, 13 (6) : 1327-1348. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2019058
[13]

Ali Akgül, Mustafa Inc, Esra Karatas. Reproducing kernel functions for difference equations. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2015, 8 (6) : 1055-1064. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2015.8.1055
[14]

Ali Akgül. A new application of the reproducing kernel method. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021, 14 (7) : 2041-2053. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2020261
[15]

Ning Lu, Ying Liu. Application of support vector machine model in wind power prediction based on particle swarm optimization. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2015, 8 (6) : 1267-1276. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2015.8.1267
[16]

Huiqin Zhang, JinChun Wang, Meng Wang, Xudong Chen. Integration of cuckoo search and fuzzy support vector machine for intelligent diagnosis of production process quality. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2022, 18 (1) : 195-217. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020150
[17]

Jun Fan, Dao-Hong Xiang. Quantitative convergence analysis of kernel based large-margin unified machines. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (8) : 4069-4083. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020180
[18]

K. Schittkowski. Optimal parameter selection in support vector machines. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2005, 1 (4) : 465-476. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2005.1.465
[19]

Pooja Louhan, S. K. Suneja. On fractional vector optimization over cones with support functions. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2017, 13 (2) : 549-572. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2016031
[20]

Florian Dumpert. Quantitative robustness of localized support vector machines. Communications on Pure & Applied Analysis, 2020, 19 (8) : 3947-3956. doi: 10.3934/cpaa.2020174

 Impact Factor: 

Tools

Metrics

  • PDF downloads (273)
  • HTML views (587)
  • Cited by (0)

Other articles
by authors

[Back to Top]

Copyright © 2022 American Institute of Mathematical Sciences | Privacy Policy