
-
Previous Article
Discriminant analysis of regularized multidimensional scaling
- NACO Home
- This Issue
-
Next Article
Generalized Nash equilibrium problem based on malfatti's problem
A robust optimization model for sustainable and resilient closed-loop supply chain network design considering conditional value at risk
1. | Department of Industrial Engineering, Yazd University, Yazd, Iran |
2. | School of Industrial Engineering, Iran University of Science and Technology, Tehran, Iran |
3. | Poznan University of Technology Faculty of Engineering, Management, Poznan, Poland, IAM, METU, Ankara, Turkey |
One of the challenges facing supply chain designers is designing a sustainable and resilient supply chain network. The present study considers a closed-loop supply chain by taking into account sustainability, resilience, robustness, and risk aversion for the first time. The study suggests a two-stage mixed-integer linear programming model for the problem. Further, the robust counterpart model is used to handle uncertainties. Furthermore, conditional value at risk criterion in the model is considered in order to create real-life conditions. The sustainability goals addressed in the present study include minimizing the costs, $ \text{CO}_2 $ emission, and energy, along with maximizing employment. In addition, effective environmental and social life-cycle evaluations are provided to assess the associated effects of the model on society, environment, and energy consumption. The model aims to answer the questions regarding the establishment of facilities and amount of transported goods between facilities. The model is implemented in a car assembler company in Iran. Based on the results, several managerial insights are offered to the decision-makers. Due to the complexity of the problem, a constraint relaxation is applied to produce quality upper and lower bounds in medium and large-scale models. Moreover, the LP-Metric method is used to merge the objectives to attain an optimal solution. The results revealed that the robust counterpart provides a better estimation of the total cost, pollution, energy consumption, and employment level compared to the basic model.
References:
[1] |
S. H. Amin and F. Baki,
A facility location model for global closed-loop supply chain network design, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 41 (2017), 316-330.
doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2016.08.030. |
[2] |
S. H. Amin, G. Zhang and P. Akhtar, Effects of uncertainty on a tire closed-loop supply chain network, Expert Systems with Applications, 73 (2017), 82-91. Google Scholar |
[3] |
G. Behzadi, M. O. Sullivan, T. Olsen and A. Zhang, Allocation flexibility for agribusiness supply chains under market demand disruption, International Journal of Production Research, 56 (2018), 3524-3546. Google Scholar |
[4] |
C. Benoît, G. A. Norris, S. Valdivia, A. Ciroth, A. Moberg, U. Bos, S. Prakash, C. Ugaya and T. Beck, The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time!, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15 (2010), 156-163. Google Scholar |
[5] |
M. Brandenburg, Low carbon supply chain configuration for a new product–a goal programming approach, International Journal of Production Research, 53 (2015), 6588-6610. Google Scholar |
[6] |
M. Brandenburg, A hybrid approach to configure eco-efficient supply chains under consideration of performance and risk aspects, Omega, 70 (2017), 58-76. Google Scholar |
[7] |
S. R. Cardoso, A. P. Barbosa-Póvoa and S. Relvas, Integrating financial risk measures into the design and planning of closed-loop supply chains, Computers & Chemical Engineering, 85 (2016), 105-123. Google Scholar |
[8] |
J. Czyzyk, M. P. Mesnier and J. J. Moré, The neos server, IEEE Computational Science and Engineering, 5 (1998), 68-75. Google Scholar |
[9] |
E. D. Dolan, Neos server 4.0 administrative guide, arXiv preprint cs/0107034. Google Scholar |
[10] |
M. Eskandarpour, P. Dejax, J. Miemczyk and O. Péton, Sustainable supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review, Omega, 54 (2015), 11-32. Google Scholar |
[11] |
H. Fang and R. Xiao, Resilient closed–loop supply chain network design based on patent protection, International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 48 (2013), 49-57. Google Scholar |
[12] |
M. Goedkoop, R. Heijungs, M. Huijbregts, A. De Schryver, J. Struijs, R. Van Zelm et al., A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level, The Hague, Ministry of VROM. ReCiPe., . Google Scholar |
[13] |
A. Goli, H. K. Zare, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam and A. Sadeghieh,
Application of robust optimization for a product portfolio problem using an invasive weed optimization algorithm, Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 9 (2019), 187-209.
doi: 10.3934/naco.2019014. |
[14] |
W. Gropp and J. Moré, Optimization environments and the neos server. Approximation Theory and Optimization (eds. md buhmann and a. iserles), 1997. |
[15] |
T. W. Hill and A. Ravindran,
On programming with absolute-value functions, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 17 (1975), 181-183.
doi: 10.1007/BF00933924. |
[16] |
M. A. Huijbregts, S. Hellweg, R. Frischknecht, H. W. Hendriks, K. Hungerbuhler and A. J. Hendriks, Cumulative energy demand as predictor for the environmental burden of commodity production, Environmental Science & Technology, 44 (2010), 2189-2196. Google Scholar |
[17] |
G. Jalali, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, M. Ghomi-Avili and A. Jabbarzadeh, A network design model for a resilient closed-loop supply chain with lateral transshipment, International Journal of Engineering, 30 (2017), 374-383. Google Scholar |
[18] |
D. K. Kadambala, N. Subramanian, M. K. Tiwari, M. Abdulrahman and C. Liu, Closed loop supply chain networks: Designs for energy and time value efficiency, International Journal of Production Economics, 183 (2017), 382-393. Google Scholar |
[19] |
G. Kara, A. Özmen and G.-W. Weber,
Stability advances in robust portfolio optimization under parallelepiped uncertainty, Central European Journal of Operations Research, 27 (2019), 241-261.
doi: 10.1007/s10100-017-0508-5. |
[20] |
S. Khalilpourazari and M. Mohammadi, Optimization of closed-loop supply chain network design: a water cycle algorithm approach, in 2016 12th International Conference on Industrial Engineering (ICIE), IEEE, (2016), 41–45. Google Scholar |
[21] |
P. R. Kleindorfer and G. H. Saad, Managing disruption risks in supply chains, Production and Operations Management, 14 (2005), 53-68. Google Scholar |
[22] |
W. Klibi, A. Martel and A. Guitouni, The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks: a critical review, European Journal of Operational Research, 203 (2010), 283-293. Google Scholar |
[23] |
R. Lotfi and N. M. AMIN, Multi-objective capacitated facility location with hybrid fuzzy simplex and genetic algorithm approach, Google Scholar |
[24] |
R. Lotfi, Y. Z. Mehrjerdi and N. Mardani, A multi-objective and multi-product advertising billboard location model with attraction factor mathematical modeling and solutions, International Journal of Applied Logistics (IJAL), 7 (2017), 64-86. Google Scholar |
[25] |
R. Lotfi, Y. Z. Mehrjerdi, M. S. Pishvaee, Razmi and A. Sadeghieh, A robust optimization approach to resilience and sustainable closed-loop supply chain network design under risk averse Presented at the 15th Iran International Industrial Engineering Conference, 2019. Google Scholar |
[26] |
R. Lotfi, G.-W. Weber, S. M. Sajadifar and N. Mardani, Interdependent demand in the two-period newsvendor problem, Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 777–792.
doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018143. |
[27] |
M. Mahmud, N. Huda, S. Farjana and C. Lang, Environmental impacts of solar-photovoltaic and solar-thermal systems with life-cycle assessment, Energies, 11 (2018), 2346. Google Scholar |
[28] |
S. Mari, Y. Lee and M. Memon, Sustainable and resilient supply chain network design under disruption risks, Sustainability, 6 (2014), 6666-6686. Google Scholar |
[29] |
S. Mari, Y. Lee and M. Memon, Sustainable and resilient garment supply chain network design with fuzzy multi-objectives under uncertainty, Sustainability, 8 (2016), 1038. Google Scholar |
[30] |
M. J. Meixell and V. B. Gargeya, Global supply chain design: A literature review and critique, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 41 (2005), 531-550. Google Scholar |
[31] |
M. T. Melo, S. Nickel and F. Saldanha-Da-Gama,
Facility location and supply chain management–a review, European Journal of Operational Research, 196 (2009), 401-412.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.007. |
[32] |
J. M. Mulvey, R. J. Vanderbei and S. A. Zenios,
Robust optimization of large-scale systems, Operations Research, 43 (1995), 264-281.
doi: 10.1287/opre.43.2.264. |
[33] |
J. Q. F. Neto, G. Walther, J. Bloemhof, J. Van Nunen and T. Spengler, A methodology for assessing eco-efficiency in logistics networks, European Journal of Operational Research, 193 (2009), 670-682. Google Scholar |
[34] |
A. R. Nour and A. M. Kamali, A weighted metric method to optimize multi-response robust problems, Google Scholar |
[35] |
N. Noyan,
Risk-averse two-stage stochastic programming with an application to disaster management, Computers & Operations Research, 39 (2012), 541-559.
doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2011.03.017. |
[36] |
M. S. Pishvaee, J. Razmi and S. A. Torabi,
An accelerated benders decomposition algorithm for sustainable supply chain network design under uncertainty: A case study of medical needle and syringe supply chain, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 67 (2014), 14-38.
doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2012.04.010. |
[37] |
S. Prakash, S. Kumar, G. Soni, V. Jain and A. P. S. Rathore, Closed-loop supply chain network design and modelling under risks and demand uncertainty: an integrated robust optimization approach, Annals of Operations Research, 1–28. Google Scholar |
[38] |
S. Prakash, G. Soni and A. P. S. Rathore, Embedding risk in closed-loop supply chain network design: Case of a hospital furniture manufacturer, Journal of Modelling in Management, 12 (2017), 551-574. Google Scholar |
[39] |
J. Quariguasi Frota Neto, G. Walther, J. Bloemhof, J. Van Nunen and T. Spengler, From closed-loop to sustainable supply chains: the weee case, International Journal of Production Research, 48 (2010), 4463-4481. Google Scholar |
[40] |
N. Sahebjamnia, A. M. Fathollahi-Fard and M. Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, Sustainable tire closed-loop supply chain network design: Hybrid metaheuristic algorithms for large-scale networks, Journal of cleaner production, 196 (2018), 273-296. Google Scholar |
[41] |
Y. Shi, L. C. Alwan, C. Tang and X. Yue, A newsvendor model with autocorrelated demand under a time-consistent dynamic cvar measure, IISE Transactions, 51 (2019), 653-671. Google Scholar |
[42] |
H. Soleimani and K. Govindan,
Reverse logistics network design and planning utilizing conditional value at risk, European Journal of Operational Research, 237 (2014), 487-497.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.030. |
[43] |
A. Sorokin, V. Boginski, A. Nahapetyan and P. M. Pardalos,
Computational risk management techniques for fixed charge network flow problems with uncertain arc failures, Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 25 (2013), 99-122.
doi: 10.1007/s10878-011-9422-2. |
[44] |
K. Subulan, A. Baykasoğlu, F. B. Özsoydan, A. S. Taşan and H. Selim, A case-oriented approach to a lead/acid battery closed-loop supply chain network design under risk and uncertainty, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 37 (2015), 340-361. Google Scholar |
[45] |
H. A. Taha, Operations Research: An Introduction, Vol. 790, Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2011. Google Scholar |
[46] |
M. Talaei, B. F. Moghaddam, M. S. Pishvaee, A. Bozorgi-Amiri and S. Gholamnejad, A robust fuzzy optimization model for carbon-efficient closed-loop supply chain network design problem: a numerical illustration in electronics industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, 113 (2016), 662-673. Google Scholar |
[47] |
R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, S. Sadri, N. Pourmohammad-Zia and M. Mohammadi, A hybrid fuzzy approach for the closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 28 (2015), 2811-2826. Google Scholar |
[48] |
S. Torabi, J. Namdar, S. Hatefi and F. Jolai, An enhanced possibilistic programming approach for reliable closed-loop supply chain network design, International Journal of Production Research, 54 (2016), 1358-1387. Google Scholar |
show all references
References:
[1] |
S. H. Amin and F. Baki,
A facility location model for global closed-loop supply chain network design, Applied Mathematical Modelling, 41 (2017), 316-330.
doi: 10.1016/j.apm.2016.08.030. |
[2] |
S. H. Amin, G. Zhang and P. Akhtar, Effects of uncertainty on a tire closed-loop supply chain network, Expert Systems with Applications, 73 (2017), 82-91. Google Scholar |
[3] |
G. Behzadi, M. O. Sullivan, T. Olsen and A. Zhang, Allocation flexibility for agribusiness supply chains under market demand disruption, International Journal of Production Research, 56 (2018), 3524-3546. Google Scholar |
[4] |
C. Benoît, G. A. Norris, S. Valdivia, A. Ciroth, A. Moberg, U. Bos, S. Prakash, C. Ugaya and T. Beck, The guidelines for social life cycle assessment of products: just in time!, The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15 (2010), 156-163. Google Scholar |
[5] |
M. Brandenburg, Low carbon supply chain configuration for a new product–a goal programming approach, International Journal of Production Research, 53 (2015), 6588-6610. Google Scholar |
[6] |
M. Brandenburg, A hybrid approach to configure eco-efficient supply chains under consideration of performance and risk aspects, Omega, 70 (2017), 58-76. Google Scholar |
[7] |
S. R. Cardoso, A. P. Barbosa-Póvoa and S. Relvas, Integrating financial risk measures into the design and planning of closed-loop supply chains, Computers & Chemical Engineering, 85 (2016), 105-123. Google Scholar |
[8] |
J. Czyzyk, M. P. Mesnier and J. J. Moré, The neos server, IEEE Computational Science and Engineering, 5 (1998), 68-75. Google Scholar |
[9] |
E. D. Dolan, Neos server 4.0 administrative guide, arXiv preprint cs/0107034. Google Scholar |
[10] |
M. Eskandarpour, P. Dejax, J. Miemczyk and O. Péton, Sustainable supply chain network design: An optimization-oriented review, Omega, 54 (2015), 11-32. Google Scholar |
[11] |
H. Fang and R. Xiao, Resilient closed–loop supply chain network design based on patent protection, International Journal of Computer Applications in Technology, 48 (2013), 49-57. Google Scholar |
[12] |
M. Goedkoop, R. Heijungs, M. Huijbregts, A. De Schryver, J. Struijs, R. Van Zelm et al., A life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level, The Hague, Ministry of VROM. ReCiPe., . Google Scholar |
[13] |
A. Goli, H. K. Zare, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam and A. Sadeghieh,
Application of robust optimization for a product portfolio problem using an invasive weed optimization algorithm, Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 9 (2019), 187-209.
doi: 10.3934/naco.2019014. |
[14] |
W. Gropp and J. Moré, Optimization environments and the neos server. Approximation Theory and Optimization (eds. md buhmann and a. iserles), 1997. |
[15] |
T. W. Hill and A. Ravindran,
On programming with absolute-value functions, Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 17 (1975), 181-183.
doi: 10.1007/BF00933924. |
[16] |
M. A. Huijbregts, S. Hellweg, R. Frischknecht, H. W. Hendriks, K. Hungerbuhler and A. J. Hendriks, Cumulative energy demand as predictor for the environmental burden of commodity production, Environmental Science & Technology, 44 (2010), 2189-2196. Google Scholar |
[17] |
G. Jalali, R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, M. Ghomi-Avili and A. Jabbarzadeh, A network design model for a resilient closed-loop supply chain with lateral transshipment, International Journal of Engineering, 30 (2017), 374-383. Google Scholar |
[18] |
D. K. Kadambala, N. Subramanian, M. K. Tiwari, M. Abdulrahman and C. Liu, Closed loop supply chain networks: Designs for energy and time value efficiency, International Journal of Production Economics, 183 (2017), 382-393. Google Scholar |
[19] |
G. Kara, A. Özmen and G.-W. Weber,
Stability advances in robust portfolio optimization under parallelepiped uncertainty, Central European Journal of Operations Research, 27 (2019), 241-261.
doi: 10.1007/s10100-017-0508-5. |
[20] |
S. Khalilpourazari and M. Mohammadi, Optimization of closed-loop supply chain network design: a water cycle algorithm approach, in 2016 12th International Conference on Industrial Engineering (ICIE), IEEE, (2016), 41–45. Google Scholar |
[21] |
P. R. Kleindorfer and G. H. Saad, Managing disruption risks in supply chains, Production and Operations Management, 14 (2005), 53-68. Google Scholar |
[22] |
W. Klibi, A. Martel and A. Guitouni, The design of robust value-creating supply chain networks: a critical review, European Journal of Operational Research, 203 (2010), 283-293. Google Scholar |
[23] |
R. Lotfi and N. M. AMIN, Multi-objective capacitated facility location with hybrid fuzzy simplex and genetic algorithm approach, Google Scholar |
[24] |
R. Lotfi, Y. Z. Mehrjerdi and N. Mardani, A multi-objective and multi-product advertising billboard location model with attraction factor mathematical modeling and solutions, International Journal of Applied Logistics (IJAL), 7 (2017), 64-86. Google Scholar |
[25] |
R. Lotfi, Y. Z. Mehrjerdi, M. S. Pishvaee, Razmi and A. Sadeghieh, A robust optimization approach to resilience and sustainable closed-loop supply chain network design under risk averse Presented at the 15th Iran International Industrial Engineering Conference, 2019. Google Scholar |
[26] |
R. Lotfi, G.-W. Weber, S. M. Sajadifar and N. Mardani, Interdependent demand in the two-period newsvendor problem, Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 777–792.
doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018143. |
[27] |
M. Mahmud, N. Huda, S. Farjana and C. Lang, Environmental impacts of solar-photovoltaic and solar-thermal systems with life-cycle assessment, Energies, 11 (2018), 2346. Google Scholar |
[28] |
S. Mari, Y. Lee and M. Memon, Sustainable and resilient supply chain network design under disruption risks, Sustainability, 6 (2014), 6666-6686. Google Scholar |
[29] |
S. Mari, Y. Lee and M. Memon, Sustainable and resilient garment supply chain network design with fuzzy multi-objectives under uncertainty, Sustainability, 8 (2016), 1038. Google Scholar |
[30] |
M. J. Meixell and V. B. Gargeya, Global supply chain design: A literature review and critique, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 41 (2005), 531-550. Google Scholar |
[31] |
M. T. Melo, S. Nickel and F. Saldanha-Da-Gama,
Facility location and supply chain management–a review, European Journal of Operational Research, 196 (2009), 401-412.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008.05.007. |
[32] |
J. M. Mulvey, R. J. Vanderbei and S. A. Zenios,
Robust optimization of large-scale systems, Operations Research, 43 (1995), 264-281.
doi: 10.1287/opre.43.2.264. |
[33] |
J. Q. F. Neto, G. Walther, J. Bloemhof, J. Van Nunen and T. Spengler, A methodology for assessing eco-efficiency in logistics networks, European Journal of Operational Research, 193 (2009), 670-682. Google Scholar |
[34] |
A. R. Nour and A. M. Kamali, A weighted metric method to optimize multi-response robust problems, Google Scholar |
[35] |
N. Noyan,
Risk-averse two-stage stochastic programming with an application to disaster management, Computers & Operations Research, 39 (2012), 541-559.
doi: 10.1016/j.cor.2011.03.017. |
[36] |
M. S. Pishvaee, J. Razmi and S. A. Torabi,
An accelerated benders decomposition algorithm for sustainable supply chain network design under uncertainty: A case study of medical needle and syringe supply chain, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 67 (2014), 14-38.
doi: 10.1016/j.fss.2012.04.010. |
[37] |
S. Prakash, S. Kumar, G. Soni, V. Jain and A. P. S. Rathore, Closed-loop supply chain network design and modelling under risks and demand uncertainty: an integrated robust optimization approach, Annals of Operations Research, 1–28. Google Scholar |
[38] |
S. Prakash, G. Soni and A. P. S. Rathore, Embedding risk in closed-loop supply chain network design: Case of a hospital furniture manufacturer, Journal of Modelling in Management, 12 (2017), 551-574. Google Scholar |
[39] |
J. Quariguasi Frota Neto, G. Walther, J. Bloemhof, J. Van Nunen and T. Spengler, From closed-loop to sustainable supply chains: the weee case, International Journal of Production Research, 48 (2010), 4463-4481. Google Scholar |
[40] |
N. Sahebjamnia, A. M. Fathollahi-Fard and M. Hajiaghaei-Keshteli, Sustainable tire closed-loop supply chain network design: Hybrid metaheuristic algorithms for large-scale networks, Journal of cleaner production, 196 (2018), 273-296. Google Scholar |
[41] |
Y. Shi, L. C. Alwan, C. Tang and X. Yue, A newsvendor model with autocorrelated demand under a time-consistent dynamic cvar measure, IISE Transactions, 51 (2019), 653-671. Google Scholar |
[42] |
H. Soleimani and K. Govindan,
Reverse logistics network design and planning utilizing conditional value at risk, European Journal of Operational Research, 237 (2014), 487-497.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejor.2014.02.030. |
[43] |
A. Sorokin, V. Boginski, A. Nahapetyan and P. M. Pardalos,
Computational risk management techniques for fixed charge network flow problems with uncertain arc failures, Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, 25 (2013), 99-122.
doi: 10.1007/s10878-011-9422-2. |
[44] |
K. Subulan, A. Baykasoğlu, F. B. Özsoydan, A. S. Taşan and H. Selim, A case-oriented approach to a lead/acid battery closed-loop supply chain network design under risk and uncertainty, Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 37 (2015), 340-361. Google Scholar |
[45] |
H. A. Taha, Operations Research: An Introduction, Vol. 790, Pearson/Prentice Hall, 2011. Google Scholar |
[46] |
M. Talaei, B. F. Moghaddam, M. S. Pishvaee, A. Bozorgi-Amiri and S. Gholamnejad, A robust fuzzy optimization model for carbon-efficient closed-loop supply chain network design problem: a numerical illustration in electronics industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, 113 (2016), 662-673. Google Scholar |
[47] |
R. Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, S. Sadri, N. Pourmohammad-Zia and M. Mohammadi, A hybrid fuzzy approach for the closed-loop supply chain network design under uncertainty, Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 28 (2015), 2811-2826. Google Scholar |
[48] |
S. Torabi, J. Namdar, S. Hatefi and F. Jolai, An enhanced possibilistic programming approach for reliable closed-loop supply chain network design, International Journal of Production Research, 54 (2016), 1358-1387. Google Scholar |

Reference | Kind of CLSC | Resilience | Disruption | Uncertainty | Risk | Objectives | Industry | Method |
Talaei et al.[46] | Reliable | Both partial, complete disruption | Probabilistic mixed programming | P-robust | Economic | Numerical example | Epsilon-constraint | |
Ghomi Avili et al. [17] | Reliable and resilient | Extra inventory Lateral transshipment Reliable and unreliable suppliers | Complete disruption | Two-stage probabilistic mixed programming | Supply risk | Economic | Numerical example | *CS |
Tavakkoli Moghaddam et al. [47] | Possibilistic fuzzy approach | Economic | Numerical example | CS | ||||
Mari et al. [28] | Sustainable and resilient | Probabilistic disruption | Probabilistic | Economic and emissions of Carbon footprints Disruption costs | Textile industry | CS | ||
Amin and Baki [1] | Fuzzy programming | Economic | Electronics industry | CS | ||||
Amin et al. [2] | Scenario | Scenario tree | Economic | Tire marketing | CS | |||
Soleimani and Govindan [42] | Two-stage scenario | CVaR | Economic | Numerical example | CS | |||
Cardoso et al. [7] | Stochastic | Variance, *VI, *DR, and CVaR | Economic (ENPV) | Numerical example | *AEC | |||
Subulan et al. [44] | Stochastic-fuzzy and possibilistic | VaR, CVaR, and downside risk | Economic and the average of the collected volume of the used products | Lead-acid battery | CS | |||
Prakash et al. [38] | Robust and reliable | Scenario | Stochastic | Worst risk case | Economic | Electronics trade industry | CS | |
Prakash et al. [37] | Waiting times | Economic | Hospital beds | CS | ||||
Sahebjamnia et al. [40] | Sustainable and resilient | Economic, environmental, and social | Tire industry | *MH | ||||
Behzadi et al. [3] | Resilient | Diversified demand market, backup demand market, and flexible rerouting | Scenario | Robust optimization | Two-stage stochastic | Economic | Kiwifruit | CS |
Brandenburg [5] | Scenario | Stochastic | Economic and environmental | FMCG manufacturer | *WGP | |||
Brandenburg [6] | Green | Simulation | VaR | Economic and environmental | Numerical example | CS | ||
The present study | Robust, sustainable resilient, and reliable | Capacity | Partial disruption | Stochastic | CVaR | Economic, Environmental, social and energy | Car manufacturing industry | CS NEOS |
*CS: Commercial Solver, AEC: Augmented epsilon constraint, MH: RDA and SA algorithm, GA and WWO algorithm, WGP: Weighted goal programming, VI: Variability index, DR: Downside risk, NA: Not Applicable. |
Reference | Kind of CLSC | Resilience | Disruption | Uncertainty | Risk | Objectives | Industry | Method |
Talaei et al.[46] | Reliable | Both partial, complete disruption | Probabilistic mixed programming | P-robust | Economic | Numerical example | Epsilon-constraint | |
Ghomi Avili et al. [17] | Reliable and resilient | Extra inventory Lateral transshipment Reliable and unreliable suppliers | Complete disruption | Two-stage probabilistic mixed programming | Supply risk | Economic | Numerical example | *CS |
Tavakkoli Moghaddam et al. [47] | Possibilistic fuzzy approach | Economic | Numerical example | CS | ||||
Mari et al. [28] | Sustainable and resilient | Probabilistic disruption | Probabilistic | Economic and emissions of Carbon footprints Disruption costs | Textile industry | CS | ||
Amin and Baki [1] | Fuzzy programming | Economic | Electronics industry | CS | ||||
Amin et al. [2] | Scenario | Scenario tree | Economic | Tire marketing | CS | |||
Soleimani and Govindan [42] | Two-stage scenario | CVaR | Economic | Numerical example | CS | |||
Cardoso et al. [7] | Stochastic | Variance, *VI, *DR, and CVaR | Economic (ENPV) | Numerical example | *AEC | |||
Subulan et al. [44] | Stochastic-fuzzy and possibilistic | VaR, CVaR, and downside risk | Economic and the average of the collected volume of the used products | Lead-acid battery | CS | |||
Prakash et al. [38] | Robust and reliable | Scenario | Stochastic | Worst risk case | Economic | Electronics trade industry | CS | |
Prakash et al. [37] | Waiting times | Economic | Hospital beds | CS | ||||
Sahebjamnia et al. [40] | Sustainable and resilient | Economic, environmental, and social | Tire industry | *MH | ||||
Behzadi et al. [3] | Resilient | Diversified demand market, backup demand market, and flexible rerouting | Scenario | Robust optimization | Two-stage stochastic | Economic | Kiwifruit | CS |
Brandenburg [5] | Scenario | Stochastic | Economic and environmental | FMCG manufacturer | *WGP | |||
Brandenburg [6] | Green | Simulation | VaR | Economic and environmental | Numerical example | CS | ||
The present study | Robust, sustainable resilient, and reliable | Capacity | Partial disruption | Stochastic | CVaR | Economic, Environmental, social and energy | Car manufacturing industry | CS NEOS |
*CS: Commercial Solver, AEC: Augmented epsilon constraint, MH: RDA and SA algorithm, GA and WWO algorithm, WGP: Weighted goal programming, VI: Variability index, DR: Downside risk, NA: Not Applicable. |
Objective | The optimal value of proposed objective function | The optimal value of base model objective function | *Avg. Gap | ||||||
Cost | Pollutant (CO2) | Energy | Employ | Cost | Pollutant (CO2) | Energy | Employ. | ||
Min Z1(Cost) | 71470.14 | 1989597.20 | 2274555.62 | 1749 | 71357.80 | 1901777.18 | 2181635.25 | 1788 | 1.7% |
Min Z2(CO2) | 174731.64 | 1250941.04 | 1953758.20 | 4399 | 171286.39 | 1217249.59 | 1882470.29 | 4499 | 1.6% |
Min Z3(Energy) | 78459.12 | 1317174.17 | 1591575.21 | 2100 | 76899.32 | 1258753.29 | 1556561.01 | 2150 | 1.6% |
Max Z4(Employ) | 176760.32 | 1734074.55 | 2358201.83 | 4505 | 173265.9 | 1650207.07 | 2263490.75 | 4520 | 2.7% |
Min Lp | 76688.59 | 1285769.68 | 1594682.21 | 2141 | 76589.90 | 1251038.15 | 1559701.11 | 2151 | 1.2% |
GAP | 0.1% | 2.8% | 2.2% | -0.45% | – | – | – | – | 1.2% |
* Avg. GAP = Average ((Proposed model objective- base model objective)/ base model objective) |
Objective | The optimal value of proposed objective function | The optimal value of base model objective function | *Avg. Gap | ||||||
Cost | Pollutant (CO2) | Energy | Employ | Cost | Pollutant (CO2) | Energy | Employ. | ||
Min Z1(Cost) | 71470.14 | 1989597.20 | 2274555.62 | 1749 | 71357.80 | 1901777.18 | 2181635.25 | 1788 | 1.7% |
Min Z2(CO2) | 174731.64 | 1250941.04 | 1953758.20 | 4399 | 171286.39 | 1217249.59 | 1882470.29 | 4499 | 1.6% |
Min Z3(Energy) | 78459.12 | 1317174.17 | 1591575.21 | 2100 | 76899.32 | 1258753.29 | 1556561.01 | 2150 | 1.6% |
Max Z4(Employ) | 176760.32 | 1734074.55 | 2358201.83 | 4505 | 173265.9 | 1650207.07 | 2263490.75 | 4520 | 2.7% |
Min Lp | 76688.59 | 1285769.68 | 1594682.21 | 2141 | 76589.90 | 1251038.15 | 1559701.11 | 2151 | 1.2% |
GAP | 0.1% | 2.8% | 2.2% | -0.45% | – | – | – | – | 1.2% |
* Avg. GAP = Average ((Proposed model objective- base model objective)/ base model objective) |
|
Cost | Pollutant |
Energy | Employment | |||
0 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 78143.63 | 1285793 | 1594659 | 2141.56 |
0.5 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 76688.59 | 1285770 | 1594682 | 2141.56 |
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 71470.15 | 1989597 | 2274556 | 1749.06 |
0.33 | 0 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 76689.36 | 1316802 | 1591633 | 2141.56 |
0.16 | 0.5 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 79603.18 | 1274957 | 1612078 | 2214.48 |
0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 174731.6 | 1250941 | 1953758 | 4399.22 |
0.33 | 0.33 | 0 | 0.33 | 81873.39 | 1270004 | 1672336 | 2340.66 |
0.16 | 0.16 | 0.5 | 0.16 | 76688.97 | 1289052 | 1592359 | 2141.56 |
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 78459.12 | 1317174 | 1591575 | 2100.21 |
0.33 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0 | 76688.59 | 1285770 | 1594682 | 2100.75 |
0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.5 | 76688.59 | 1285770 | 1594682 | 2141.56 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 176760.3 | 1734075 | 2358202 | 4505.85 |
0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 76688.59 | 1285769.68 | 1594682.21 | 2141.55 |
|
Cost | Pollutant |
Energy | Employment | |||
0 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 78143.63 | 1285793 | 1594659 | 2141.56 |
0.5 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 76688.59 | 1285770 | 1594682 | 2141.56 |
1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 71470.15 | 1989597 | 2274556 | 1749.06 |
0.33 | 0 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 76689.36 | 1316802 | 1591633 | 2141.56 |
0.16 | 0.5 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 79603.18 | 1274957 | 1612078 | 2214.48 |
0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 174731.6 | 1250941 | 1953758 | 4399.22 |
0.33 | 0.33 | 0 | 0.33 | 81873.39 | 1270004 | 1672336 | 2340.66 |
0.16 | 0.16 | 0.5 | 0.16 | 76688.97 | 1289052 | 1592359 | 2141.56 |
0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 78459.12 | 1317174 | 1591575 | 2100.21 |
0.33 | 0.33 | 0.33 | 0 | 76688.59 | 1285770 | 1594682 | 2100.75 |
0.16 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 0.5 | 76688.59 | 1285770 | 1594682 | 2141.56 |
0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 176760.3 | 1734075 | 2358202 | 4505.85 |
0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 0.25 | 76688.59 | 1285769.68 | 1594682.21 | 2141.55 |
Problem | Lower bound | Main model | Worst-case | GAP1 | GAP2 | |||
LP-Relax |
Time GAMS | Main model |
Time | Relaxation |
Time GAMS | |||
P1 | 10862.19 | 2.00 | 76688.59 | 8.40 | 173172.68 | 2.41 | -86% | 126% |
P2 | 15720.97 | 3.83 | 90009.11 | 93.68 | 239036.43 | 3.41 | -83% | 166% |
P3 | 21307.43 | 11.33 | 111813.32 | 1082.85 | 301446.39 | 8.33 | -81% | 170% |
P4 | 44956.51 | 843.11 | *127011.40 | *3705.6 | 457454.73 | 521.33 | -65% | 260% |
P5 | 74585.42 | 2967.01 | *165745.37 | *28810 | 668562.73 | 1530.36 | -55% | 303% |
P6-P8 | No solution was found | |||||||
* Solved by NEOS-Server, GAP1= (B-A)/A, GAP2=(C-B)/B. |
Problem | Lower bound | Main model | Worst-case | GAP1 | GAP2 | |||
LP-Relax |
Time GAMS | Main model |
Time | Relaxation |
Time GAMS | |||
P1 | 10862.19 | 2.00 | 76688.59 | 8.40 | 173172.68 | 2.41 | -86% | 126% |
P2 | 15720.97 | 3.83 | 90009.11 | 93.68 | 239036.43 | 3.41 | -83% | 166% |
P3 | 21307.43 | 11.33 | 111813.32 | 1082.85 | 301446.39 | 8.33 | -81% | 170% |
P4 | 44956.51 | 843.11 | *127011.40 | *3705.6 | 457454.73 | 521.33 | -65% | 260% |
P5 | 74585.42 | 2967.01 | *165745.37 | *28810 | 668562.73 | 1530.36 | -55% | 303% |
P6-P8 | No solution was found | |||||||
* Solved by NEOS-Server, GAP1= (B-A)/A, GAP2=(C-B)/B. |
Parameters | Value | Description |
( |
Demand for various scenarios | |
uniform (1000, 2000) | ||
uniform(40000, 50000) | ||
uniform(3000, 4000 | ||
uniform(1000, 2000) | Fixed costs (opening) (Thousand dollar) | |
uniform(2000, 3000) | ||
uniform(2000, 3000) | ||
uniform(1000, 2000) | ||
uniform(3, 4) | ||
uniform(3, 4) | ||
uniform(3, 4) | ||
uniform(3, 4) | Variable costs (Dollar) | |
uniform(3, 4) | ||
uniform(3, 4) | ||
uniform(3, 4) | ||
uniform(3, 4) | ||
uniform(100,200) | ||
uniform(1000, 2000) | ||
uniform(100,200) | ||
uniform(100,200) | Fixed pollution (opening) (carbon dioxide) (Centiton) | |
uniform(100,200) | ||
uniform(100,200) | ||
uniform(100,200) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | Variable pollution (carbon dioxide) (Centiton) | |
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4000, 5000) | ||
uniform(40000, 50000) | ||
uniform(4000, 5000) | ||
uniform(4000, 5000) | Fixed consumed energy (opening) (MJ) | |
uniform(4000, 5000) | ||
uniform(4000, 5000) | ||
uniform(4000, 5000) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | Variable pollution (MJ) | |
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(40, 50) | ||
uniform(300,400) | ||
uniform(40, 50) | ||
uniform(5, 10) | Fixed employment (person) | |
uniform(20, 30) | ||
uniform(10, 15) | ||
uniform(5, 10) | ||
uniform(1000, 1100) | ||
uniform(1000, 1100) | ||
uniform(1000, 1100) | ||
uniform(1000, 1100) | Salary Cost (Dollars) | |
uniform(1000, 1100) | ||
uniform(1000, 1100) | ||
uniform(1000, 1100) | ||
uniform(0.95, 0.98); | ||
uniform(0.95, 0.98); | ||
uniform(0.95, 0.98); | ||
uniform(0.95, 0.98); | Availability probability (percent) | |
uniform(0.95, 0.98); | ||
uniform(0.95, 0.98); | ||
uniform(0.95, 0.98); | ||
uniform(50000, 60000)*(( |
||
uniform(100000, 110000)*(( |
||
uniform(20000, 22000)*(( |
||
uniform(3000, 3300)*(( |
Capacity (facility) | |
uniform(20000, 22000)*(( |
||
uniform(5000, 5500)*(( |
||
uniform(3000, 3300)*(( |
||
0.33 | Scenario occurrence probability | |
uniform(0, 0.2) | Expectation value weight | |
uniform(0, 0.1) | Fine associated with demand dissatisfaction | |
uniform(0, 0.1) | CVaR index importance | |
uniform(0, 0.05) 95% | Confidence level in CVaR | |
0.05 | Fine coefficient of demand dissatisfaction for quadruple objective | |
0.05 | ||
0.05 | ||
0.05 | ||
uniform(0, 1) | Return percentage | |
uniform(0.7, 0.71) | ||
uniform(0.2, 0.21) | ||
uniform(0.1, 0.11) | ||
0.25 | Objective weight |
Parameters | Value | Description |
( |
Demand for various scenarios | |
uniform (1000, 2000) | ||
uniform(40000, 50000) | ||
uniform(3000, 4000 | ||
uniform(1000, 2000) | Fixed costs (opening) (Thousand dollar) | |
uniform(2000, 3000) | ||
uniform(2000, 3000) | ||
uniform(1000, 2000) | ||
uniform(3, 4) | ||
uniform(3, 4) | ||
uniform(3, 4) | ||
uniform(3, 4) | Variable costs (Dollar) | |
uniform(3, 4) | ||
uniform(3, 4) | ||
uniform(3, 4) | ||
uniform(3, 4) | ||
uniform(100,200) | ||
uniform(1000, 2000) | ||
uniform(100,200) | ||
uniform(100,200) | Fixed pollution (opening) (carbon dioxide) (Centiton) | |
uniform(100,200) | ||
uniform(100,200) | ||
uniform(100,200) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | Variable pollution (carbon dioxide) (Centiton) | |
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4000, 5000) | ||
uniform(40000, 50000) | ||
uniform(4000, 5000) | ||
uniform(4000, 5000) | Fixed consumed energy (opening) (MJ) | |
uniform(4000, 5000) | ||
uniform(4000, 5000) | ||
uniform(4000, 5000) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | Variable pollution (MJ) | |
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(4, 5) | ||
uniform(40, 50) | ||
uniform(300,400) | ||
uniform(40, 50) | ||
uniform(5, 10) | Fixed employment (person) | |
uniform(20, 30) | ||
uniform(10, 15) | ||
uniform(5, 10) | ||
uniform(1000, 1100) | ||
uniform(1000, 1100) | ||
uniform(1000, 1100) | ||
uniform(1000, 1100) | Salary Cost (Dollars) | |
uniform(1000, 1100) | ||
uniform(1000, 1100) | ||
uniform(1000, 1100) | ||
uniform(0.95, 0.98); | ||
uniform(0.95, 0.98); | ||
uniform(0.95, 0.98); | ||
uniform(0.95, 0.98); | Availability probability (percent) | |
uniform(0.95, 0.98); | ||
uniform(0.95, 0.98); | ||
uniform(0.95, 0.98); | ||
uniform(50000, 60000)*(( |
||
uniform(100000, 110000)*(( |
||
uniform(20000, 22000)*(( |
||
uniform(3000, 3300)*(( |
Capacity (facility) | |
uniform(20000, 22000)*(( |
||
uniform(5000, 5500)*(( |
||
uniform(3000, 3300)*(( |
||
0.33 | Scenario occurrence probability | |
uniform(0, 0.2) | Expectation value weight | |
uniform(0, 0.1) | Fine associated with demand dissatisfaction | |
uniform(0, 0.1) | CVaR index importance | |
uniform(0, 0.05) 95% | Confidence level in CVaR | |
0.05 | Fine coefficient of demand dissatisfaction for quadruple objective | |
0.05 | ||
0.05 | ||
0.05 | ||
uniform(0, 1) | Return percentage | |
uniform(0.7, 0.71) | ||
uniform(0.2, 0.21) | ||
uniform(0.1, 0.11) | ||
0.25 | Objective weight |
[1] |
Benrong Zheng, Xianpei Hong. Effects of take-back legislation on pricing and coordination in a closed-loop supply chain. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021035 |
[2] |
Min Li, Jiahua Zhang, Yifan Xu, Wei Wang. Effects of disruption risk on a supply chain with a risk-averse retailer. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021024 |
[3] |
Kai Kang, Taotao Lu, Jing Zhang. Financing strategy selection and coordination considering risk aversion in a capital-constrained supply chain. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021042 |
[4] |
Juliang Zhang, Jian Chen. Information sharing in a make-to-stock supply chain. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2014, 10 (4) : 1169-1189. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2014.10.1169 |
[5] |
Haodong Chen, Hongchun Sun, Yiju Wang. A complementarity model and algorithm for direct multi-commodity flow supply chain network equilibrium problem. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (4) : 2217-2242. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020066 |
[6] |
Jun Tu, Zijiao Sun, Min Huang. Supply chain coordination considering e-tailer's promotion effort and logistics provider's service effort. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021062 |
[7] |
Qiang Lin, Yang Xiao, Jingju Zheng. Selecting the supply chain financing mode under price-sensitive demand: Confirmed warehouse financing vs. trade credit. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (4) : 2031-2049. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020057 |
[8] |
Xianbang Chen, Yang Liu, Bin Li. Adjustable robust optimization in enabling optimal day-ahead economic dispatch of CCHP-MG considering uncertainties of wind-solar power and electric vehicle. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (4) : 1639-1661. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020038 |
[9] |
Khosro Sayevand, Valeyollah Moradi. A robust computational framework for analyzing fractional dynamical systems. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2021 doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2021022 |
[10] |
Paul A. Glendinning, David J. W. Simpson. A constructive approach to robust chaos using invariant manifolds and expanding cones. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (7) : 3367-3387. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020409 |
[11] |
Mrinal K. Ghosh, Somnath Pradhan. A nonzero-sum risk-sensitive stochastic differential game in the orthant. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021 doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021025 |
[12] |
Kuei-Hu Chang. A novel risk ranking method based on the single valued neutrosophic set. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021065 |
[13] |
Ajay Jasra, Kody J. H. Law, Yaxian Xu. Markov chain simulation for multilevel Monte Carlo. Foundations of Data Science, 2021, 3 (1) : 27-47. doi: 10.3934/fods.2021004 |
[14] |
Kehan Si, Zhenda Xu, Ka Fai Cedric Yiu, Xun Li. Open-loop solvability for mean-field stochastic linear quadratic optimal control problems of Markov regime-switching system. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2021074 |
[15] |
Liqin Qian, Xiwang Cao. Character sums over a non-chain ring and their applications. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2021 doi: 10.3934/amc.2020134 |
[16] |
Wenyuan Wang, Ran Xu. General drawdown based dividend control with fixed transaction costs for spectrally negative Lévy risk processes. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2020 doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020179 |
[17] |
Eduardo Casas, Christian Clason, Arnd Rösch. Preface special issue on system modeling and optimization. Mathematical Control & Related Fields, 2021 doi: 10.3934/mcrf.2021008 |
[18] |
Sarra Delladji, Mohammed Belloufi, Badreddine Sellami. Behavior of the combination of PRP and HZ methods for unconstrained optimization. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2021, 11 (3) : 377-389. doi: 10.3934/naco.2020032 |
[19] |
Lei Liu, Li Wu. Multiplicity of closed characteristics on $ P $-symmetric compact convex hypersurfaces in $ \mathbb{R}^{2n} $. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2021, 41 (6) : 2635-3652. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2020378 |
[20] |
Ru Li, Guolin Yu. Strict efficiency of a multi-product supply-demand network equilibrium model. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2021, 17 (4) : 2203-2215. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2020065 |
Impact Factor:
Tools
Metrics
Other articles
by authors
[Back to Top]