# American Institute of Mathematical Sciences

February  2021, 1(1): 47-59. doi: 10.3934/steme.2021004

## The Virtual reality electrical substation field trip: Exploring student perceptions and cognitive learning

 1 Faculty of Engineering and Information Sciences, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, Australia

* Correspondence: sasha@uow.edu.au; Tel: +61-2-4221 3418

Received  November 2020 Revised  January 2021 Published  February 2021

COVID19 has disrupted many higher education's learning experiences, including those related to work integrated learning. This included the cancelling of the annual electrical engineering field trip to a local electrical substation. Field trips provides students an opportunity to connect their classroom learning with industry relevant engaging experiences. While virtual reality (VR) alternatives to electrical substations have been implemented and researched, the focus has been on the innovation and not on the educational benefits. The impact on learning is not well documented and understood. To address this gap an experimental study is conducted on fifty electrical engineering students at the University of Wollongong to determine if a VR replica of an electrical substation can provide an equal or better learning and student experience compared to traditional methods. A successful finding would provide confidence to implement such alternatives for situations that include: addressing COVID disruptions; for students that miss the field trip; and for providers that don't have the funds or resources to visit a substation. It was found that the VR substation simulation provided a comparable student experience and stronger cognitive learning benefits than traditional methods. Further research is needed to explore learning impact beyond the cognitive domain.

Citation: Erdem Memik, Sasha Nikolic. The Virtual reality electrical substation field trip: Exploring student perceptions and cognitive learning. STEM Education, 2021, 1 (1) : 47-59. doi: 10.3934/steme.2021004
##### References:

show all references

##### References:
Distance view of simulation environment
Drawing in correct location with correct text
Questionnaire results (substation visit/virtual reality)
 Category Questions Average score (substation) Average score (virtual reality) Difference between traditional and VR Significance level Learning Contents 1. I understood most of the learning contents throughout the teaching activity 3.7 3.9 0.2 4% P = 0.8282 2. I can identify the major components in an electrical substation and what they look like after the teaching activity 3.6 4.1 0.510% P = 0.6045 3. I understood the operation of major components within a substation during the teaching activity 3.6 3.8 0.24% P = 0.8525 4. The learning activity provided useful knowledge on electrical substations 3.6 4.1 0.510% P = 0.6045 5. The learning activity was helpful at learning components in an electrical substation and their operation 3.7 4.0 0.36% P = 0.7560 Operational Experience 6. It was easy to coordinate through the teaching activity 3.8 3.8 0.00% P = 1.0000 7. The speed and execution of the teaching activity was easy to keep up with 3.0 4.4 1.428% P = 0.1642 8. The teaching activity was not disorienting 3.9 3.4 0.510% P = 0.6235 9. The teaching activity motivated me to learn more about electrical substations 4.0 4.4 0.48% P = 0.6344 10. I am satisfied by the experience of the learning activity 4.3 4.3 0.00% P = 1.0000 Total 37.2 40.2 3.06% P = 0.7545 *Statistical Significance (P < 0.05)
 Category Questions Average score (substation) Average score (virtual reality) Difference between traditional and VR Significance level Learning Contents 1. I understood most of the learning contents throughout the teaching activity 3.7 3.9 0.2 4% P = 0.8282 2. I can identify the major components in an electrical substation and what they look like after the teaching activity 3.6 4.1 0.510% P = 0.6045 3. I understood the operation of major components within a substation during the teaching activity 3.6 3.8 0.24% P = 0.8525 4. The learning activity provided useful knowledge on electrical substations 3.6 4.1 0.510% P = 0.6045 5. The learning activity was helpful at learning components in an electrical substation and their operation 3.7 4.0 0.36% P = 0.7560 Operational Experience 6. It was easy to coordinate through the teaching activity 3.8 3.8 0.00% P = 1.0000 7. The speed and execution of the teaching activity was easy to keep up with 3.0 4.4 1.428% P = 0.1642 8. The teaching activity was not disorienting 3.9 3.4 0.510% P = 0.6235 9. The teaching activity motivated me to learn more about electrical substations 4.0 4.4 0.48% P = 0.6344 10. I am satisfied by the experience of the learning activity 4.3 4.3 0.00% P = 1.0000 Total 37.2 40.2 3.06% P = 0.7545 *Statistical Significance (P < 0.05)
Overview of pre-test and post-test results
 Achievement Test Mean Standard Error of the mean Standard Deviation Control Group Pre-Test 8.5333 0.1919 0.7432 Post-Test 11.2667 0.3581 1.3870 Experimental Group Pre-Test 8.4000 0.2545 0.9856 Post-Test 13.6667 0.2702 1.0465
 Achievement Test Mean Standard Error of the mean Standard Deviation Control Group Pre-Test 8.5333 0.1919 0.7432 Post-Test 11.2667 0.3581 1.3870 Experimental Group Pre-Test 8.4000 0.2545 0.9856 Post-Test 13.6667 0.2702 1.0465
 [1] Kemal Kilic, Menekse G. Saygi, Semih O. Sezer. Exact and heuristic methods for personalized display advertising in virtual reality platforms. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2019, 15 (2) : 833-854. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2018073 [2] Yi Zhang, Xiao-Li Ma. Research on image digital watermarking optimization algorithm under virtual reality technology. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems - S, 2019, 12 (4&5) : 1427-1440. doi: 10.3934/dcdss.2019098 [3] Luca Consolini, Alessandro Costalunga, Manfredi Maggiore. A coordinate-free theory of virtual holonomic constraints. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2018, 10 (4) : 467-502. doi: 10.3934/jgm.2018018 [4] Joshua Du, Liancheng Wang. Dispersion relations for supersonic multiple virtual jets. Conference Publications, 2011, 2011 (Special) : 381-390. doi: 10.3934/proc.2011.2011.381 [5] Samuel T. Blake, Thomas E. Hall, Andrew Z. Tirkel. Arrays over roots of unity with perfect autocorrelation and good ZCZ cross-correlation. Advances in Mathematics of Communications, 2013, 7 (3) : 231-242. doi: 10.3934/amc.2013.7.231 [6] Sie Long Kek, Mohd Ismail Abd Aziz, Kok Lay Teo. A gradient algorithm for optimal control problems with model-reality differences. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2015, 5 (3) : 251-266. doi: 10.3934/naco.2015.5.251 [7] Erfan Babaee Tirkolaee, Alireza Goli, Mani Bakhsi, Iraj Mahdavi. A robust multi-trip vehicle routing problem of perishable products with intermediate depots and time windows. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2017, 7 (4) : 417-433. doi: 10.3934/naco.2017026 [8] Michael Schraudner. Projectional entropy and the electrical wire shift. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2010, 26 (1) : 333-346. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2010.26.333 [9] Ke Zhang, Maokun Li, Fan Yang, Shenheng Xu, Aria Abubakar. Electrical impedance tomography with multiplicative regularization. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2019, 13 (6) : 1139-1159. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2019051 [10] Bastian Gebauer. Localized potentials in electrical impedance tomography. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2008, 2 (2) : 251-269. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2008.2.251 [11] Giuseppe Capobianco, Tom Winandy, Simon R. Eugster. The principle of virtual work and Hamilton's principle on Galilean manifolds. Journal of Geometric Mechanics, 2021  doi: 10.3934/jgm.2021002 [12] Božidar Jovanović, Vladimir Jovanović. Virtual billiards in pseudo–euclidean spaces: Discrete hamiltonian and contact integrability. Discrete & Continuous Dynamical Systems, 2017, 37 (10) : 5163-5190. doi: 10.3934/dcds.2017224 [13] Jafar Sadeghi, Mojtaba Ghiyasi, Akram Dehnokhalaji. Resource allocation and target setting based on virtual profit improvement. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2020, 10 (2) : 127-142. doi: 10.3934/naco.2019043 [14] Hongming Yang, Dexin Yi, Junhua Zhao, Fengji Luo, Zhaoyang Dong. Distributed optimal dispatch of virtual power plant based on ELM transformation. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 2014, 10 (4) : 1297-1318. doi: 10.3934/jimo.2014.10.1297 [15] Kari Astala, Jennifer L. Mueller, Lassi Päivärinta, Allan Perämäki, Samuli Siltanen. Direct electrical impedance tomography for nonsmooth conductivities. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2011, 5 (3) : 531-549. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2011.5.531 [16] Ville Kolehmainen, Matti Lassas, Petri Ola, Samuli Siltanen. Recovering boundary shape and conductivity in electrical impedance tomography. Inverse Problems & Imaging, 2013, 7 (1) : 217-242. doi: 10.3934/ipi.2013.7.217 [17] Sie Long Kek, Mohd Ismail Abd Aziz, Kok Lay Teo, Rohanin Ahmad. An iterative algorithm based on model-reality differences for discrete-time nonlinear stochastic optimal control problems. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2013, 3 (1) : 109-125. doi: 10.3934/naco.2013.3.109 [18] Sie Long Kek, Kok Lay Teo, Mohd Ismail Abd Aziz. Filtering solution of nonlinear stochastic optimal control problem in discrete-time with model-reality differences. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2012, 2 (1) : 207-222. doi: 10.3934/naco.2012.2.207 [19] Sie Long Kek, Mohd Ismail Abd Aziz. Output regulation for discrete-time nonlinear stochastic optimal control problems with model-reality differences. Numerical Algebra, Control & Optimization, 2015, 5 (3) : 275-288. doi: 10.3934/naco.2015.5.275 [20] Jianguo Huang, Sen Lin. A $C^0P_2$ time-stepping virtual element method for linear wave equations on polygonal meshes. Electronic Research Archive, 2020, 28 (2) : 911-933. doi: 10.3934/era.2020048

Impact Factor: